Haha, not when it’s memorizations. I’d doubt I’d pass most of my exams in uni.

It’s just a question of whether or not you want to repeat, for many that’s a solid no

That depends on if you want time

Yeah no thanks, I’d rather not be bored for 2 decades again, without the fun of thinking like a child.

Right?! Worst years of our lives are spent waiting in glorified daycare till we are 18.

This is a guess but the fluid dynamics likely changes? As the size of the group increases the Reynolds number probably increases making inertia a significant factor.

Individual human runners in air is maybe a bad analogy think more like honey where every stroke pushes you back as much as it pushes you forward.

This article might interest you https://doi.org/10.1529%2Fbiophysj.107.118257

From your first article

“Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is entirely focused on an explanation of life’s biological diversity. It is a scientific theory meant to explain observations about species. Yet some have used the theory to justify a particular view of human social, political, or economic conditions. All such ideas have one fundamental flaw: They use a purely scientific theory for a completely unscientific purpose. In doing so they misrepresent and misappropriate Darwin’s original ideas”

So what is this post trying to do?

More like two people sharing resources to reproduce more effectively while having a gun pointed towards each other at all times