Stop changing the subject. Answer the question. Will you support him?

Let’s start with how it’s racist to stop religious fundamentalists from abusing women. This should be fun.

Refusing to answer the question is not good faith.

Would you support him?

Sacrifice your country to Trump

It seemed really obvious to me that he was talking about actual youth, ie Zoomers. But you started throwing a bunch of statistics about millenials.

Millenials are a politically active generation. The fear is that Zoomers are not. That was the point I got from his comment.

Blah blah blah, answer the question please. You talk like a politician. Would you support him?

None of you dumb fuckers has any idea what “medieval” means.

On Sep 7, 1944, a group of American pilots was tasked with bombing a radio tower at Chichijima Island in the Pacific theater. The Japanese resistance was strong, and many American planes were shot down. Eight pilots managed to parachute to the ground safely but were caught by the Japanese.

The Japanese military tortured them and then brutally executed them, in at least one case forcing the prisoner to dig his own grave before killing him. After the prisoners were executed, the Japanese cannibalized them, not due to lack of rations but to show “fighting spirit”.

A ninth pilot parachuted away that day. The Japanese sent small boats out to try to capture him, but American airplanes arrived to force the Japanese boats back. The pilot was swimming in the open ocean far from any nearby ships when an American submarine suddenly breached the water in front of him and rescued him.

That pilot then went on to become the 41st President of the United States.

Medieval peasant uprisings were inevitably put down and the perpetrators brutally massacred, and also their families.

The first successful uprisings weren’t until the 1800s.

Inns existed in large cities during the medieval period.

Yeah.

I was meaning in the sense of would you vote for him? Would you support him?

That’s the most naive thing I’ve heard in a long time, I’m not quite sure where to start.

If they’re in power and let the government, they get blamed for it.

Demonstrably not true, Republicans love this tactic because people tend to AT BEST blame both sides. Voters are incredibly misinformed.

Let the government fail. If it’s in a position where one political entity gets to hold it hostage in perpetuity, it’s functionally unsalvageable and broken by design

I don’t know how you could get to this conclusion. Let the government fall, because by attempting to break it, Republicans have automatically made it just as bad as if it was already broken? That’s an incredibly dumb statement.

Millenials are old now. We’re not “the youth”, we’re like mid-30s to early 40s.

You need to have a role for the market. Central planning is a demonstrably bad idea.

But a heavily regulated market is the sweet spot.

When he becomes the nominee, what will you do?

Not really. I don’t understand where you’re going.

Are you saying Democrats should threaten to break the government? Republicans would call that bet, because breaking the government is a good thing to them.

Sedition, I think.

I can legally express my opinion that based on the Supreme Court’s ruling it would be legal for Biden to - as an official presidential act - dissolve SCOTUS in a vat of acid.

If I could, I’d give him mine. He’s way more important than me.