![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/80fb034c-85b7-440f-b3c0-ceb93695fc6d.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
That’s most of the establishment. Even new money people are mostly crooks. And then you get people like Rowling who make money honestly and join the far right cult of the wealthy.
That’s most of the establishment. Even new money people are mostly crooks. And then you get people like Rowling who make money honestly and join the far right cult of the wealthy.
Yes, I did. Wow, I’m happy to know that it works. The double notifications are wierd and a touch annoying, (something for devs to fix).
I’m happy it’s worked. But so long as I’m replying to you I suppose I don’t need to tag you.
It’s stopping people from subbing to different communities which is probably a bad thing.
The people’s compassion is sadly not represented in government.
Twitter appears to have copied it too.
We called them streaming services. Calling them stream-ers sounds like the media is trying to make them sound cuddly and non hostile.
Good post. Butlerian Jihad when?
hand-mirror-chad-face-meme.jpgjxl
We see your handle, bear.
Incredible that everything he wrote could be prefaced with that ridiculous assertion lol. It’s like having a large gem topped with a turd.
I blocked that community and it is great over here on greener pastures. Now I can talk politics on all the other communities I’m subbed to.
The other guy, schmidt-something is pointing out that people will use their instances to have like-minded community whether that’s interests, language or specialism, while you appear to be advocating for the reddit type congregation of people and for some reason also arguing against the other guy’s description of reality, of how things are. I don’t see why you are offended at him…
And I see you have your own anxiety and disagreement about the nature of Lemmy’s federated system. That’s no reason to shoehorn it into every discussion.
I think you are pessimistic about Lemmy’s potential for small communities.
But have you considered that we’re not indexed on Google yet? And we largely don’t have a pervasive culture of promoting niche communities yet like they did on the large subreddits. So this is two other ways small communities aren’t being found in the first place.
I’m not getting that, but maybe that’s because I’m on Firefox with a bunch of extensions.
Very marxian.
But I’m talking about ‘new athiests’ a specific cringe, backwards and reactionary movement from around the 2010s. Not atheism in general.
Have you seen this? https://youtu.be/tmk47kh7fiE
If the issue is that old school atheists kept their mouths shut, while new atheists are out and proud, you and I are not going to see eye to eye.
If you think ‘new’ means modern, as in present day, then you’ve been arguing with me for hours for no reason. Because ‘new atheism’ refers to a specific movement, around the 2010s. It’s not simply ‘atheism’ now.
I don’t care about shouty atheists or quiet atheists, it literally doesn’t matter to me. I am wary of people congregating around easy targets like broadly religious people, when religious people can mean anybody. It can be a white supremacist American, or it could be a Yemeni Muslim getting genocided by Saudis using American and UK bombs. And I don’t see that very important distinction made when those low iq anti-theist posts are spammed on c/all.
Are you a child?
You appear to be somewhat progressive from your other comments, but you have a wierd blindspot when it comes to religion. You apparently defend black people but don’t realise that minority religious groups can and often have been racialised and attacked in similar ways to how a minority group would be. This is strange behaviour.
New atheism cringe is different to being pro abortion, women’s autonomy, and advancing marginalised people’s rights. Completely different.
If you specifically identify with new atheism and the thinking of Dawkins and his brigade, I’d seriously reconsider.
Also a great hack to lower your personal rate of inflation.