• 5 Posts
  • 61 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 27th, 2024

help-circle
  • JustMarkov@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlHow do we replace YouTube?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    If I’m sending encrypted mail to gmail, only that one mail is compromised once decrypted on gmail’s servers.

    What? How? Most private email providers only support encryption like Proton to Proton or Tuta to Tuta. Emails sended to anything else stay unencrypted. And there’s no way you’re going to use this stupid password protection everytime, because if you do, then why would you even use email?

    Do you only send mail to gmail users or something?

    Almost everyone uses Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo or whatever. Unfortunately, not everyone are privacy concious like you and me.

    smtp is no better or worse than xmpp, irc or whatever else if you have end to end encryption.

    No, it’s not. Emails should not be used by political activists to communicate. Even the best email providers like Proton or Tuta can’t give you 100% protection and this activist arrest is the perfect example.
    Email is the obsolete protocol, that should only be used to register on random websites and get authorization codes. For everything else you should use secure messaging apps.


  • JustMarkov@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlHow do we replace YouTube?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Trusting law-abiding corporations to protect your privacy is fundamentally a bad idea, and as such, promoting Proton as a private alternative to Google

    You can’t trust anyone, that’s true. But self-hosting your own 100% bulletproof MailCow server on 1984 VPS, which you pay for in Monero won’t make you any more private, because emails you send still end up on Gmail inboxes.
    It’s simply unneccesary for normal user with not so high threat model. And if you’re a political activist, then why even using email instead of normal privacy communication solutions like SimpleX, Session or Briar?







  • JustMarkov@lemmy.mlOPtoLinux@lemmy.mlImmutable distros recommindation?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    It’s complicated and I have a few reasons.

    1. Last time I used it, Fedora’s updates were too unstable. I twice got updates breaking my system setup. For example, with openSUSE it happened only once (recent broken Mesa update). Also openSUSE updates surprisingly feel more stable than Fedora ones.
    2. I don’t like Red Hat. Even though I understand that open-source projects are complex and I should separate developers from their software, that doesn’t change my opinion on Red Hat.
    3. This problem stems from the previous ones. Using Fedora I feel like a beta-tester for future Red Hat projects and especially RHEL.

    Keep in mind, that I last used Fedora on versions 37–38 and things might have changed since.


  • From OpenSUSE there’s also leap micro. Never used it, but maybe worth looking at.

    I heard of it, but it seems more server/development focused, rather than desktop.

    For instance, I could never get used to dnf, but it’s largely irrelevant on an atomic distro anyways.

    100% agree, dnf is a bummer. Maybe I’ll give Kinoite a shot, as it has many differences with “vanilla” Fedora.









  • JustMarkov@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlTruly independent web browser
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    From their website:

    Why build a new browser in C++ when safer and more modern languages are available?

    Ladybird started as a component of the SerenityOS hobby project, which only allows C++. The choice of language was not so much a technical decision, but more one of personal convenience. Andreas was most comfortable with C++ when creating SerenityOS, and now we have almost half a million lines of modern C++ to maintain.
    However, now that Ladybird has forked and become its own independent project, all constraints previously imposed by SerenityOS are no longer in effect. We are actively evaluating a number of alternatives and will be adding a mature successor language to the project in the near future. This process is already quite far along, and prototypes exist in multiple languages.