Yes indeed they were, but the nearest I had to an “ID” shot from that group was:
But that really lacks interest!
Refugee from Reddit
Yes indeed they were, but the nearest I had to an “ID” shot from that group was:
But that really lacks interest!
Nice shot, and interesting to see a Jackdaw with such odd feathers (given they “ought” to be black and a bit of a darker gray around the head). Also, was this taken inside a food court or similar?
Because you presumably post here to share something you think others might like/be informed/be enlightened by and this doesn’t appear to be doing that at the moment. However, if not posting for that reason, I suppose I can go hunting for the Block User option.
While I share the question “Why?” I might hazard a guess that there’s almost an echo of the colours of the Sainsbury’s sign with the colours of the tarmac and its white and yellow lines, or even of the pale blue car and the sky - I could almost imagine a “I like it but I don’t know why” mood.
But then, same poster as “11 miles to the city” two days ago.
Ummm … not sure of your goal with this photo and title. Perhaps viewing the bollards as an 11 in their own right, but even then I don’t get “to the city”.
Do you mean the nuthatch? If so, I’ve observed that they favour certain trees, and with patience you will possibly get lucky. I don’t have that level of patience - one day, perhaps! But even then, as you say, to get the leaves framing the sky round the bird…
Yes, the first one is a sad statement, rather than technically great art.
Photos of reflections can do wonderful things, as here!
First time I’ve had my camera with me when seeing them hover - I’m not complaining about the angle :)
And there was I thinking “that looks made up” :)
I should have added that I’d tried that and got nothing - which surprised me as usually very good (though Sound ID can be a bit addictive)
And not entirely to my surprise, Windhover is even in the Oxford English Dictionary!
Try this one - still messed with, but gives more of the shadows
Which, just cropped out of the camera’s RAW format (suffering from the classic dark bird against white sky issue with auto-ISO) was
Since the swallows were back in roughly the same place, and same (decent) light today, I tried with 1/2000s - and got a couple of shots that were clear improvements. E.g.
So, Canon R6 + RF200-800mm lens at full length, F9, ISO 1250, Exposure bias on camera +1 step at the suggested 1/2000s
To give a sense of cropping/distance, that’s 296 x 296 pixels from a camera whose full frame is 5472 x 3648
Trying for the photos hand held for twenty minutes or so (with rests) left me with extremely tired arms!
Oh! Thank you.
I’d assumed you were just using it’s standard nickname (e.g. Jenny Wren or Robin Redbreast). I wonder whether it is named from it’s cousin’s English nickname. As an example of that, Robins were once just “Redbreasts”, got nicknamed Robin, and somehow, the nickname became the standard way to name them. As you can perhaps tell, this derivation amuses me
Nice - which wagtail is that?
This is actually the truly crazy (and heavy!) RF200-800mm, with F9 at 800mm (and they do one even madder at x4 the price or so).
Sadly, Canon don’t let others use their RF interfaces, so I’d guess Sigma, etc. don’t try hard to work with Canon anymore.
I know for birds the ideal is closer to the suggested 1/2000s, but in practice that seems out of reach without doing bad things to the ISO with this lens/body. While the camera was doing auto-ISO to 100-350, the photos needed quite a bit of increased brightness when processing (RAW of course) to bring out the bird, so there was little to spare. And this, in sunshine. If I’d been thinking, some exposure compensation on the camera would have been sensible, but I doubt the end result would be much better.
Not that I’m aware of - just eats storage and battery! That said, with a heavy camera, you’re unlikely to keep it firmly on target for much of the burst!
I think what’s happening is the long focal length allowing distant shots is giving a much greater depth of being in focus, combined with decent sunlight, and often trees in the full frame that are the right sort of distance way (these are massively cropped down from the full frames). This gives a better chance of the auto-focus getting it right. Also, swallows do have slower glide phases in their flight which can help to get on target. What I was forgetting is to try burst shooting to up my chances.
Oh they are indeed. Previous years I’ve seen them tucking into large thistle heads (so about head height) in sunshine which is an utter delight - alas, this years weather or something has denied me of that pleasure. The following is from 2022: