![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/fwrQkf9edg.png)
Yeah, you don’t get our mass-produced chocolate, you get handmade better chocolate. You bastard!
Yeah, you don’t get our mass-produced chocolate, you get handmade better chocolate. You bastard!
After watching his management skills in business, I suspect his being a father isn’t a great thing for his kids.
Just FYI you sound like an asshat with your hot takes, based on bias and ignorance.
I am saying that it’s ok for Israel to go after the people who attacked them, it’s not ok to blow up children and innocents.
Oh sure one sec…let’s see…bomb a refugee camp, a hospital, and ambulances and kill kids and others who did nothing or…take a surgical attack on the people who attacked you? Tough decisions…hmmm…going to go with attack the actual people who attacked you.
The hubris and the gall of those crazy leftists, they don’t want dead babies what monsters!
Reddit is just another Israeli propaganda hole pretending to be objective and fair. All those stereotypes of the “Jews are controlling the media” sure are not being dismissed with their handling of the latest crisis information coming out. At this point I give zero fucks for Israel or funding them anything, it’s not good seeing US arms destroying innocents, and that includes our shitty foreign policy on other nations. We need to stop acting like petulant angry chimps.
And the world just shrugs and says Israel has the right to do this…disgusting.
No, it doesn’t sound like that at all, it is that. And Zionism is the “chosen people” so you are correct, just a twist on the “master race” for 2023.
If there was ever a time that a person or nation took the sympathy of the world, and twisted it into action against them it is this. Israel can go fuck off now, as a previous Israel supporter I do not anymore.
Who the fuck tips a landlord?
I don’t know what else to say but I am exhausted with stupid rich people being in my life. I think the French were on to something…
Ever seen an oil tanker turn? That is the the way the world works with Israel slowly and not quick to judge. The rest of us though have had enough, fuck Israel and no funding of them whatsoever.
Crazy thought, why don’t we just not bomb hospitals? Anyone?
Or how to make people hate you more than Hamas, a book by the IDF.
So you are qualified to discount anyone related to a subject, that you don’t have any access to their research or the education to know about it? I certainly don’t, so I just listen to what they say and not attack them or who they are related to.
I would guess, and this is completely a guess, these are Elon fans who think that the vaccines were dangerous and had microchips in them.
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “what about…?”) denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation. From a logical and argumentative point of view it is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin ‘you too’, term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.[1][2][3][4]
The communication intent is often to distract from the content of a topic (red herring). The goal may also be to question the justification for criticism and the legitimacy, integrity, and fairness of the critic, which can take on the character of discrediting the criticism, which may or may not be justified. Common accusations include double standards, and hypocrisy, but it can also be used to relativize criticism of one’s own viewpoints or behaviors. (A: “Long-term unemployment often means poverty in Germany.” B: “And what about the starving in Africa and Asia?”).[5] Related manipulation and propaganda techniques in the sense of rhetorical evasion of the topic are the change of topic and false balance (bothsidesism).[6]
Some commentators have defended the usage of whataboutism and tu quoque in certain contexts. Whataboutism can provide necessary context into whether or not a particular line of critique is relevant or fair, and behavior that may be imperfect by international standards may be appropriate in a given geopolitical neighborhood.[7] Accusing an interlocutor of whataboutism can also in itself be manipulative and serve the motive of discrediting, as critical talking points can be used selectively and purposefully even as the starting point of the conversation (cf. agenda setting, framing, framing effect, priming, cherry picking). The deviation from them can then be branded as whataboutism.[citation needed]
Both whataboutism and the accusation of it are forms of strategic framing and have a framing effect.[8]
Israel is always begging for us to support them, their vile terrorist unhinged actions will make that argument super hard next round. Dems will control the Senate, House, and POTUS and they will not want to have dead kids all over their signatures and families from Israeli actions. They did this to themselves, they could have gone after Hamas instead of kids.
I have a very strong don’t blow up kids policy, that doesn’t care what religion or political party you subscribe to or even race. If you do blow up kids, we feel strongly that you should just fuck right off and we should do whatever we can to stop those killing kids.
Before 1948, Palestine was home to a diverse population of Arabs, Jews, and Christians, as all groups had religious ties to the area, especially the city of Jerusalem. The land itself was under the control of various empires, such as the Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, and eventually the Islamic Caliphate and the Ottoman Empire.
https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3700m.gla00129/?sp=10&r=-0.249,0.355,1.545,0.93,0
https://www.ebay.com/b/Postal-Card-Stationery-Palestinian-Postal-Stamps-Pre-1948/98957/bn_73555113
At this point, I would argue that Israel has done more for Hamas PR and popularity than anything in the last 20 years.