There’s an interesting theory that Hitler was put in place by time travelers as the last-bad option that wouldn’t destroy the timeline.

Hitler (and Trump) made a number of blundering errors that any idiot should’ve/known better than to make. Had a competent, or even a supervillain-type been in charge, things could’ve turned out even worse than they did. You don’t have to look far- some of these villains attach themselves to those in power. Himmler and Heydrich would’ve been far worse for the world, but were somewhat limited by not being the ones directly in power.

This does exist on certain vehicles, like ambulances.

But I’ve heard (unconfirmed) that it would be illegal in several states to put on passenger vehicles.

While I would generally agree with that statement (and gave you an up vote for it), I feel like Musk twisted that away from any normal business move.

For instance, many customers aren’t paying for premium features. Rather, they were extorted into paying, because their professional lives depend on it.

And even after all that, it’s not like it’s catering to users on any level. No one is saying that Twitter is better now. Well, no one except the Russian bots and the Nazis.

When a business blames its customers for choosing to no longer be its customers, it’s a sure sign the business is declining. Depending on the severity, it’s often a sign the business is failing.

This applies here, as well as any time you see an article that millennials are killing <business/industry/etc>. It also applies when an entertainer blames their (potential) audience for not enjoying their work. See Jerry Seinfeld, Kid Rock, etc.

No one owes your business any patronage.

This isn’t true, at least in the US. The vast majority of dog food is safe for human consumption, albeit not recommended.

Just FYI, 538 today is not the same as it was when they became noteworthy. Nate Silver left the company (and its parent, Disney). He also took his models with him, since those were merely licensed (unlike the name/company).

The new 538 is being run by a guy with very questionable models.

There are a number of them being floated right now. If Biden had dropped out a year ago, they would’ve had a traditional competition in the primary. Then we would’ve all gotten complacent and assumed we had it made, and we’d end up in 2016 again.

But to directly answer your question, the names I see being floated the most are CA gov Newsom, MI gov Whitmer, KY gov Beshear, and PA gov Shapiro. And yes, switching to any of them would be difficult and risky.

The surprise shouldn’t be that you’re about to propose. The surprise should be in how you choose to propose.

Unless the ring’s details are part of the surprise (which they could be, if it’s meaningful to the couple), clear and open communication should be preferred

A much better question is why does the government (by way of its appointed monitor) think they have a say on the matter? IANAL, but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the first amendment right to free speech. This is especially true as a result of Citizens United, as bad as the ruling was.

That’s nothing new. It’s always a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich, and has been for a long time

Vegetarian can be cheaper, but isn’t a guarantee. If you are eating processed foods like single serving meals, the vegetarian options are often more expensive for the same quality.

Cooking yourself, from scratch, would save a lot more money. Plus it actually is cheaper to use veggies.

Looking forward to seeing this on Technology Connections. Seems right up his alley.

But knowing his timeframe of products, it’ll probably be 20 years from now…

They are allowed to run, because there’s no law stopping them.

As for why they have a chance at winning, I don’t think I can answer that without significant bias.

Just for additional context, this is not a recent development. It was designed in 2010, with a model exhibited in 2011.

Ref: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_Coaster

Then why do you need to tolerate it better?

There’s something missing in this ask. If you don’t handle a food very well, you simply avoid/reduce it. Whether it’s caffeine, an allergy, or whatever.

Why do you need to change your body’s reaction? Why not just switch to decaf or other drinks?

It does if you have career progression and promotions in mind. Also if you’re looking for some new insights to shake things up.

He should sic them on SCOTUS instead

Yes, and they’ve also started it with Harris.

Good news (everyone)!

He was later retconned into having a long, happy life with alternate Frye.

With perks like that who needs donors and TV ad time? This isn’t the 80s. Elections aren’t won on television ads.

No, but they are still very much won with money. Advertising of various forms (TV, radio, Internet, billboards, yard signs, T-shirts, the list goes on), local outreach, field offices, door to door campaigners, booths at events, social media, and countless more. All of it is driven by money.

Citizens United fucked every election since. It exclusively dealt with campaign finance.