Precedent is dead thanks to chevron overturned. Supreme court took a massive shit on it

If you read the wiki comments there was someone questioning the relevance and thinking it should be removed before ending up a conspiracy theory lol

Is television commercial appearance notable?

“He is featured in a 2023 advertisement for BlackRock, an investment firm, that was filmed at his high school.” [12] -> CNN “What we know page”

I can sort of see an argument for both sides

but I also pretty much guarantee its gonna be a talking point on A. Jones’ show by end of this week if it stays in the article (maybe also if it doesn’t, but yeah)

What advantage is there is changing nameservers? Is it just the centrally manage DNS or something else? I’m fairly new to self hosting and only serving locally for now.

I do know cloudflare uses the same nameservers PER ACCOUNT so if you’re wanting to have multiple domains but keep one or more connections separated from you then this does draw a minor connection to a subset of Cloudflare accounts with the same two nameservers

this BBC interview with a guy outside the security perimeter who claims he saw the shooter before he fired is absolutely wild

Wow, you weren’t kidding

AT&T told the SEC it does not believe this incident is likely to materially impact AT&T’s financial condition or results of operations.

This is part of the problem. They don’t care, and don’t think it will hurt them. Why would they? No one is holding these corporations accountable.

I’m very sorry to hear that about your friend and experience. And thank you for your service!

But the answer is simple: it’s a cult. They are brainwashed (and ironically think everyone else are the ones brainwashed). So it doesn’t make sense and they just ignore that or have cognitive dissonance.

And unfortunately it’s just very difficult to dismantle a cult. Just look at scientology/mormonism/jw/etc.

I tried asking ChatGPT to roleplay as Trump and repeat it in it’s own words, however it gave me back the same near-verbatim. I think this proves that the original text wasn’t far off

Listen, folks, you’re totally missing the point here. Trees aren’t a problem; they’re an incredible, untapped resource.

Look at them—millions, no, billions of trees just sitting there, doing nothing. They’re not making a single cent for our amazing billionaires. Imagine the fantastic things our billionaires could do if we let them chop down all those trees. We’d have an endless supply of beautiful toilet paper for everyone and billions of Bibles, plus a copy of the Constitution, all for the fantastic price of $65.

And guess what? By getting rid of all these trees, we’d also solve the problem of forest fires. No trees, no forest fires—so simple.

Now, we’ll keep some forests, especially near homes, but not for the reasons you think. We need those forests to burn down sometimes and take a few houses with them. Why? Because then we can rebuild those homes with the trees we chopped down elsewhere—a huge win for the construction industry. Plus, it means higher insurance premiums for homes near forests, and we can even privatize forest fire services. Think of all the benefits for our billionaires.

When you start thinking about the money, it all makes perfect sense.

deleted by creator

Ive had mixed results with this, but one author was really excited (as was i) and we had a good back and forth for a bit after i had a chance to read/digest the paper.

You literally asked if they were that bad at logic while offering no actual refute to what they had to say. But whatever, have a nice day

Now class, over here is a blatant example of the ad hominem fallacy

It’s an ai roleplay app of some sort. The user (pink text) instructed it to say hello world in html and the ai did it. Showing the app vulnerable to prompt injections since it didn’t do any kind of validation before sending the request to chatgpt/similar and then returning the response.

Not preferred pronouns. Just pronouns

Please note that the trans community no longer uses the phrase “preferred pronouns” as it implies that trans people’s pronouns are a preference, not a fact.

https://glaad.org/reference/transgender

Op, glaad and hrc both have great resources to dig into

https://www.hrc.org/our-work/parents-for-transgender-equality-network (see supporting your trans children page)

I heard Mormons are also known as LSD cuz they use so much. Amish going to wipe the floor with them.

Also the Amish have horses

I cannot abide bestiality-adjacent people who have a disproportionally high number of groomers in their community.

Citation needed. Tbh this sounds like a fascinating dataset but I’m skeptical it even exists.

Little more info

Reportedly 2gb of data

The data includes the “full names, email addresses, passwords, and usernames” of people associating with Heritage, vio said, including users with U.S. government email addresses. “This itself can have an impact to heritage’s (sic) reputation,” they added, “and it’ll especially push away users in positions of power.”

(And thank you gay furry hackers 🫡)

deleted by creator

I think wed just need the following

• rel.id (primary key)
• rel.user_id (foreign key to person.id)
• rel.user_id2 (foreign key to person.id)
• rel.type (type of relationship)
• rel.start (non null)
• rel.end

From there you don’t need a rel.status because you’re not updating this rel.id entry except for the rel.end. if they started dating again later it would be a whole new entry, and then you could query their entire dating history to see if they keep coming back to the same person, dating around, playing the field, etc. Separately there could be a friendship relationship that is tracked so you could if they ended being friends after a breakup.

To that point a person table with a relationship table. So this way you can reference relationship between two or more persons within the relationship table and that could be joined to the person table if needed. I don’t think you’d really be able to keep it within one table while exploring multiple relationships unless you’re storing a list of ids that is interpreted outside of sql. Also a relationship table would allow exploring other types of relationships such as exes, love interests, coworkers, family, friends, etc

The article said the man had done similar with airport wifi and a place of prior employment. But the airplane one is an odd choice