Dude I think you have replied to the wrong comment
Dude I think you have replied to the wrong comment
There is a difference between software getting updated and software getting fixed though. We want the first scenario not the second one
Fucking FIA blue balling us
Seems like brave search has some ways to go before it becomes competitive with the big guys
Cheers man. Thank you for all your hard work on uBlue and all the images. You are doing amazing work.
I would have reported it but I wasn’t sure whether it was a local issue or a server issue and didn’t want to burden you with an issue without the proper information. Also no worries bugs happen and I have seen no group or organisation react as openly and promptly to bugs as you people do. I hope that sometime in the future, you open donations for uBlue so that people like me who can’t code can show our appreciation for this incredible project
Considering that McLaren and arguably even Ferrari/merc, depending on the track, have jumped them on car performance, even Verstappen victories are very unlikely. I don’t know how they think perez is finishing anywhere near the podium in the current situation.
This. Be proactive. Don’t wait for microsoft
Yeah I think it is. Especially because the error got resolved on its own. Thanks
What’s weird is that I did not run into these results when I searched for the error. What search engine do you use¿?
I am not using secure boot so I don’t think that’s the issue
Considering that the sprints are an completely separate event now, these penalties should not be applicable in the sprint. For a team like AT who are very unlikely to finish top 8, it is an easy way avoid any real consequences of the penalty.
Edit : Hell for any team, it is advantageous to take the penalty during the sprint which gives out reduced points and then have the fresh engine penalty free for the actual race where much more points are at stake
Yuki is looking older here than he looks now
The weird thing is that Ferrari have been better than merc have been in strategy this year
Now the plan is to put them in some shitbox occasionally to do the same thing.
I thought the rookies will be racing the cars of the respective teams with whom they are allied with not in some random machinery. Like each constructors puts a car with a rookie
What exactly does ‘taking the piss’ even mean¿?
So rumours of Max’s demise and perez’s rise were greatly exaggerated. Max messed up the set up in one race and was slower than checo (on a track that is checo’s favourite mind you) and people came crawling out of their holes claiming checo is quick and that the car screwed him(which is true but only to an extent) and that the only reason max was quick is because he had an illegal car and shit
Asked Lando for a ‘swear free’ reaction to him(lando) almost binning it into the wall.
Love piastri trolling the FIA in the cool down room
Crazy how good he has been right from the start
Got to say I don’t see their logic. They got to build a successful team in the long term and changing drivers repeatedly does not aid that. All the youngsters who were successful in their first F2 season are good/great in F1 as well(Russell, leclerc, piastri, Norris, tsunoda) so neither pourchaire nor bortoleto are poor choices and I would argue are a better choice than bottas in the long term.
Well my comment was not about having control over the software/firmware though that will be cool.
My logic is that well tested, polished software/firmware have very few bugs and hence most of the updates they get are feature additions or improvements to current functionality (examples in an EV could be updates making the BMS more robust, tweaking the regen modes according to feedback from the users, etc). Poorly tested, half baked software/firmware will be full of bugs and broken functionality and will lead to ‘updates’ where all the changes are correcting broken functionality and serious bugs. This will be an unpleasant experience for the user and we should hold companies accountable when they do shit like this