![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
3100493 😅
3100493 😅
I don’t see how this is possible. The router has EIGHT aerodynamic antennas.
Maybe they should have added one or two more…
How. Dare. You.
Disgusting humans…
Remember the good old days where doing a Save-As immediately brought up the file explorer dialog?
Just the nudes. Nothing else.
It means it’s just a recommendation.
If the AI generated content is labeled, or has context, or has comments or descriptions created by people, then wouldn’t it just be the same as synthetic training data? Which is shown to still be very useful for training.
Nuh uh, I’m pretty sure he said ‘mouse’, not cursor. So, that could mean two things.
Something topic-adjacent is going down in BC, Canada right now.
We had a large timber company that branched out into crypto mining, augmented with solar. They made an absolute killing with this pivot, and wanted to expand. But need a metric fuck-ton of electricity. The local utility company denied them, citing their own issues with keeping up with demand in the near future. The timber company sued them, and I think it settled to this:
Out of curiosity, of those that are getting infected multiple times, have you been keeping up with your vaccinations? Fully or partially, or not at all?
Even got the browncoat in there
I feel like this can, and should, be handled client-side. It would be a relatively simple matter of auto-hiding a post where the title is a duplicate match to anything in the last, say, 25 posts. User configurable.
I know that feels like a hack, but for the reasons posted by the top commenters, we don’t want to make things weird for parallel communities.
I’d even do a $50 founders pledge/edition or some junk like that. Let’s get this rolling LJ!
I was going to ask in a full post, but as a comment on this topic would be better: what kind of modifiers would we type in when we want to narrow a web search scope to the fediverse? Like, it’s easy to just add ‘reddit’ to any query, that instantly cuts out all the BS. Hoping there’s some magic keyword in the metadata in the ActivityPub guts.
Someone feel free to start a full post on this, if you figure it’s warranted.
I think you’ve nailed this prediction!
I am really, really looking forward to AR in general, and I like to think of myself as a proponent and early adopter of new tech.
That being said, I don’t think we’ll see this gen of Vision take off. In fact, I’m kind of surprised at Apple for even releasing anything. They usually swoop in on newly established tech, do it better, then claim they invented it. Maybe that’s what they’re doing here, but it still feels too early. Until the gear is the size of large-frame sunglasses, I don’t think it’ll be adopted by the masses. Maybe their relegation of this product to the livingroom and workspace will help to prove me wrong.
I was commenting on the original post, which was an assertion that “Autopilot was not as safe as Tesla would have you believe.”.
I think you hopped topics all-together. And I actually agree with you.
Still almost exactly half the crash rate of human-only drivers. Therefore, we should ban human-only driving.
I get confused at first glance any time I read: anti-[anything] critics.