“carnist” has a different meaning than omnivore. It’s used for people who actively defend what they think is their right to consume flesh.
“carnist” has a different meaning than omnivore. It’s used for people who actively defend what they think is their right to consume flesh.
maybe, but you can’t feed a population on backyard farms. If everybody wants to eat eggs, there has to be a massive production, and it will be this kind of hell. The only logical way to prevent this is to stop treating animals as resources. We are perfectly able to feed with plants, we know how to get every necessary nutrient. Animal agriculture needs to stop, and if we’re truly leftists, we have to stand against any exploitation. How could we evolve as a society if we continue to use sentient beings as mere resources?
And I accidentally misread this as Sangria.
…what? I’m very tired.
The TT!
Also, which ones of these options are gender identities?
Delicious.
Roll for friendship!
Classic Ziltoid, being omniscient and very bisexual
Ah nice, a good ol’ story with a transphobie plot
I will never stop finding hilarious that a transport company is named TPG (which is used in French for “trans-pédés-gouines” aka “trans-fags-dykes” as a reappropriation term, often used in our communities)
How dare you attack me like that
I fucking love the Autistic Doctor
i’m interested if you have any source about this
But monster is owned by pepsico, the genocide-friendly mega Corp :( Steal monster or buy something else
Technically, is making hats out of human leather actually a crime?
basically the same way we assert the right to tell people to stop using ai, to stop being racist, sexist, transphobic, using planes or heavy cars, giving money to fascists…
chosing to view animals as resources is not about diet, it’s about power over sentient beings and hierarchy of lives based on species.