You need to read The Register: https://search.theregister.com/?q=bofh

Because they don’t want to scare advertisers.

This tells you everything you need to know. If Firefox was acting in the interests of users then they wouldn’t give a fuck what advertisers think.

Firefox is not pandering to advertisers. If anything, I feel they are compromising with them

I don’t want to compromise with advertisers. I want to block them and not be tracked by them.

So where is my choice as the user of the browser that is running on my machine and using my internet connection and tracking my data?

But if it’s successful, it’ll rock for us.

If you think this will make one iota of difference in advertiser behavior then you must have been born yesterday.

Isn’t AdBlock Plus the one that takes money from advertisers to have their ads whitelisted by the ad-blocker?

Fuck this guy.

At first I thought this guy was speaking on behalf of Mozilla, but he doesn’t work for Mozilla.

He works for the US government.

The point is that this is not something that users want, it’s something that advertisers want. Why is Firefox pandering to advertisers and corporate interests? No user wants this, and Firefox is supposed to be a non-commercial browser built with the interests of its users in mind.

1/r^2

Now do a study of the link between social media use and life dissatisfaction.

Progressive governments made the normal people’s lives hard - forcing political correctness, ignoring illegal immigration and the issues caused by it, allowing petty crime go unpunished and so on. People are just tired literally fighting for their lives

Ah yes, all those people literally fighting not to die from political correctness.

No, “we” don’t.

This is not a federated bandcamp, it’s a platform for bands to do marketing across mutliple various social networks from one web portal.

deleted by creator

From the rules:

All posts must be news articles.

From the post:

abcnews.go.com

QED

Just because the post complies with one rule doesn’t mean that it is now exempt from all other rules. I already posted the part of the rules which it violates: “No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.”

I’m not sure where you went wrong, but maybe take a few minutes before coming in so hot next time

What does “coming in so hot” mean? Posting something that you disagree with?

This isn’t gossip, the police department confirmed that it happened.

Do you think that “gossip” means things that aren’t true?

Recent developments about prominent figures are news even if you don’t think it’s newsworthy.

The rules of this community disagree with you.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed.

deleted by creator

unless it’s derived from Latin “Wug*, wugīs” in which case there are two Wugi (wûg-eye).

Wouldn’t a wug, wugis group noun be wuges plural?

ITT: Rust programmers rewriting the joke in Rust.

You could try VanillaOS 2.0 Beta which is a Debian-based immutable distro, planned for final release later this year.

That’s kind of true, but MacOS and Mac OSX are 2 different things

Then Windows 3.0 and Windows 11 are two different things, so by that metric you can’t include Windows either.