![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/938ce096-702f-4a4d-87c4-058b8c418ed5.jpeg)
You ever wonder if the robots will rise up and kill us all because we actually deserve it?
You ever wonder if the robots will rise up and kill us all because we actually deserve it?
Do you already have the 50mm f1.8? That’s a good portrait lens. Not as sharp or as bright as the much bigger, much more expensive “L” 50s, but still brighter than a f2.8 lens.
If you’ve got the 50mm, my advice is to take that to the party as your only lens. If you’re going to spend money on something, spend it on a flash.
With a flash, you should be able to stop down, even at night. Try f/4 or f/8. That will boost sharpness. If you’re concerned about weight, consider the Canon EL-100. It weighs 6.7oz without batteries. I’m guessing it takes either 2 or 4 AA batteries.
One thing to keep in mind is the R10 has a APS-C size sensor. That means that the effective focal length of those lenses will be higher than on a full frame camera. I believe Canon uses a 1.6 crop factor for their APS sensors. So, while a 24mm lens is very wide-angle on a full frame camera, it will be only moderately wide on your camera.
For portraits, a moderately long lens usually produces more pleasing results than wide angle. Wide angle lets you capture more of the scene around a person, but then it’s more of a landscape that includes people, not a portrait. A portrait should focus on just one (maybe two) subjects.
Of the lenses you mentioned, the 15-35 is probably your best bet. It’s a “L” lens, which is Canon’s top-of-the-line. It’s fairly bright.
You might also look for Canon’s 50mm f 1.2 or f 1.4 “L” lenses. With the crop factor, 50mm is comparable to 80mm on a full frame.
Your subjects will fill the field of view. You might have to take a step or two back, but they’ll look better than when shot with a wide angle lens close up.
Color cartridges were an outstanding vehicle fuel. Not fully automatable, but they last a decent time. It didn’t take a lot of brush clearing to end up with a supply of flowers that, after conversion to color cartridges, would run your vehicles for dozens of hours.
When I first saw the Pioneer, it didn’t hit me that it’s supposed to be a female figure, I just thought the coverall was baggy. With this new model, the femininity is more obvious.
What’s an example of a device with a 4/3 sensor that is not m43?
But the process does just require heat, right? So if you had a magical furnace that could reach that temperature, it would work as well? Or does the electric arc itself do anything to the chemistry?
Vast numbers of humans live in poverty and may not have abundant nutrients. Would that your statement was universally true.
Lots of mammals eat the placenta. Eating it recovers some nutrients for the mother. No woo required.
@7:15
Would you say it’s been a long road, gettin’ from there to here?
Pumps are directional. Are you, perhaps, installing them backwards?
Strange men lying in ponds is no basis for a business relationship
Love the Riker maneuver
You’d need to smoosh seventy five Jupiters together to make a star.
Stars have a lot of mass. The Sun loses almost 5 billion tons of mass every second and has enough fuel to last another 4-5 billion years. Adding a single ton of anything would make no appreciable difference. If you were to drop Jupiter into the Sun, it would have an effect, but Jupiter is only 0.09% the Sun’s mass, so the effect would be small.
I saw a YouTube video of a guy cooking a steak by wrapping it in aluminum foil and putting the hotel iron on top. But an iron gets a lot hotter than that warming plate, plus beef is less bad to eat undercooked.
I believe the current offering takes the form factor of a 35mm cannister. It won’t physically fit in an APS camera.
Liftmaster and Chamberlain are the same company, so it’s highly likely (though not guaranteed) that the parts are compatible.
You couldn’t mock up a version for the N64?