![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Spotify doesn’t make changes like that on its own, the artist probably did that for a reason
Spotify doesn’t make changes like that on its own, the artist probably did that for a reason
Always the right answer
I’ve tried most of the apps, none of them really feel right to me unfortunately. Luckily this issue is just a bug with 0.18.0
Truly a site of the people
This sounds like an extremely annoying way to do things on mobile
I really wish people would think a bit bigger. I hear “I don’t want regular people here/it doesn’t need to grow” all the time but don’t you wonder how much better things would be if the average person wasn’t constantly on a platform designed to enrage and exploit them?
Usernames are only unique within servers, just like with email addresses. there’s only one john@gmail.com but john@yahoo.com is a different person
Then there should be a single unified sign up page that sends you to a random instance or something. You still need an easy onboarding process for less technical people
The problem is it takes time and money to do that, which you can’t really get without some kind of structure. I’ve been wondering what a tech cooperative might look like lately. All the weight of a company like reddit, but owned by the users
I’m with you, but it is a bit odd for android given the push for material design
Ansible runs on your local machine, but it executes the setup on your (Linux) server remotely via SSH. I’d definitely recommend the Ansible setup, it was the easiest I tried. Are you able to SSH into your server already?
Those numbers hardly describe a “plunge”. Much lower impact than I had hoped honestly
It’s got nothing to do with piss!
Thank you for the more thorough explanation, I’m from the US and not used to these kind of sweeping consumer protection laws lol. Does that mean Lemmy is also in violation? Does deleting a post on my home instance notify federated instances to delete it as well?
Ok? I haven’t discussed this before.
I find it hard to believe a court would decide that a post someone intentionally made to a public forum could be considered private information after the fact. But I suppose I’m not vary familiar with the wording of GDPR. It feels a bit like someone giving away business cards with a phone number, and being upset that people don’t return them when you ask months later. Obviously it is scummy for reddit to not delete content when requested, but that doesn’t seem to be the sort of thing the law is targeted towards
as much as I’m sick of reddit, posts and comments are not PII
It wouldn’t be LemOn party without him!
As far as I know, there were no regulations the submersible company were obligated to follow, so the families of the billionaires, who signed waivers informing them of that fact, should be held accountable as well.
It will be federated, but not with activitypub. It looks like they’re developing a more comprehensive system for federation