![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/919f6295-6470-4daf-b10c-ea475bc5ed7d.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/eb9cfeb5-4eb5-4b1b-a75c-8d9e04c3f856.png)
Even if so, your unreasonably pessimistic assumption is that this would be an exclusive source of revenue. Once content is created, cross-posting is free.
On the Fediverse also as @mapto@qoto.org
Можете да намерите и като @mapto@masto.bg
Abito in Italia @mapto@feddit.it
Even if so, your unreasonably pessimistic assumption is that this would be an exclusive source of revenue. Once content is created, cross-posting is free.
Thanks for doing the maths. Actually, it does show that there’s a small, but unexploited market here. $2-3K a month is a very good income for the most of the world. And this doesn’t have to be the only revenue stream.
Could you elaborate, please. I’m genuinely interested
The relevance of the post to the community should be made clear by the contents of the post. As it currently stands, there are no indicators that the event would have any influence on Iran’s support for the Russian invasion.
Yup, @tearsintherain@leminal.space, what you’re engaging in here is pure whataboutism. Fox, Carlson and company would’ve happily helped here, but they didn’t. NYT did.
Researching on time and place of arrival is a nice gift for anyone who wants to intercept these and is being cut off from doing this research themselves.
Then there’s paying attention as in comprehending, and paying attention as in internalising. The latter takes more effort and time, as it includes relating to previous knowledge. It is not as often that lecturers manage to guide students to think along.
I guess when taking notes, it is beneficial if you manage also to abbreviate and summarise. This is another skill that should be acquired at university.
Heh, when it rains, it’s certainly capitalism’s fault. This ways one doesn’t have to solve individual problems, just dream of abstract revolutions
From Day 1 Google’s business model has been to show sponsored content before search results. You’re probably thinking about the search engines before them.
Isn’t it dangerous to identify untruth with falsehood? Or is it just clickbait headlines? There’s an implicit positivist assumption here anyway.
“Our entire epistemology of science and research relies on the chain of footnotes,” explains author Martin Eve, a researcher in literature, technology and publishing at Birkbeck, University of London. “If you can’t verify what someone else has said at some other point, you’re just trusting to blind faith for artefacts that you can no longer read yourself.”
Isn’t this the natural state of things for the unprivileged majority of us that in the reality of publisher paywalls do not have access to the riches of Anglo-American research centres? Apparently Eve doesn’t know that libraries in the most of the world still struggle with paying fees to Springer. As a consequence, researchers in affiliated institutions do not have access to the corresponding published content.
“If we eclipse the Sun in the future with technological solutions, it may affect the clouds” - is this guy for real? Please, tell me it’s a nightmare
Anyone being able to find anything meaningful on this one? I can’t, but this doesn’t mean much.
Thanks. I didn’t know this and it is very useful information.