Can we start labeling opinion articles? It can be misleading
If you’re here, there’s still hope for the internet
Don’t let it fall
Can we start labeling opinion articles? It can be misleading
I’m tired of how big bananas are now. Small bananas ftw
Damn, you’ve mentioned lemmy irl? And other people have known about it?
They still do, they just can’t perform it
There’s no runoff If I remember, all your votes are tallied instantly, so you rank them the same if you feel the same towards them
That’s pretty much star voting, except you can give candidates the same ranking
I’d rather a strange human sleep with me than a dog
Well the baseline is that most wallpaper apps, which don’t pay artists afaik, charge like $5 a year, so if you’re gonna charge me 50, I expect 90% to go to artists
It’s 50%, which is honestly quite low
Here’s the extent of the design constraints by the bill:
(b) (1) A business shall not develop or maintain a mobile operating system that does not include a setting that enables a consumer to send an opt-out preference signal to businesses with which the consumer interacts through the mobile operating system.
(2) This subdivision shall become operative six months after the adoption of regulations by the California Privacy Protection Agency that outline the requirements and technical specifications for an opt-out preference signal to be used by a mobile operating system.
(c) The California Privacy Protection Agency may adopt regulations as necessary to implement and administer this section, including, but not limited to, ensuring that the setting described by subdivision (a) is easy for a reasonable person to locate and configure and updating the definitions of “browser” and “mobile operating system” to address changes in technology, data collection, obstacles to implementation, or privacy concerns.
It has to:
idk guys, seems pretty difficult to me /s
That’s crazy, we even go MIT professors on lemmy, alongside A-list celebrities
Many journalists seem to think twitter is the whole internet. When trump left, so did coverage of his posts. I don’t know if it’s overall a bad thing. This article argues you should look at what he says so as to not let it fade in the background, but trump is a very much “all attention is good attention” type of guy
Some context, this girl’s character is one of those people strongly against using swear words with bad meanings, so to her it’s quite a bit worse.
Didn’t cause me any trouble either
Why do you need either? Just throw the both in the html
I can’t think of any image that would have made it ok
It’s super easy, the main problem is no one will move. I still moderate a couple on reddit, but it was hard enough getting people even there, certainly no one will come here.