![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/dbeda0de-d3fb-4fab-8703-3e52e72cb4db.jpeg)
Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Economics: How much are you willing to pay?
Smarter you in a few years ;)
I’m with you on that. My comment was more like sometimes the appendices seem to get out of hand. They probably contain entire papers there.
No need to rush to conclusions, I do read appendices when needed. My point is not that authors should cut the appendices or compromise on any other good open science practices. The point is that disproportionately large appendices make one wonder if some of that stuff actually belongs in the main text. If it is just a robustness check that gives a similar result, fine, make a footnote in the main text and put the analysis in the appendix. But what if it is actually relevant information that changes the perception of the main text?
Shoot up
Thanks for the insight!
Yes, just checked)
Why did they replace bash with zsh?
Pretty sure that’s referee 2
I guess they would simply offer a tiered subscription based on how often you can do it
Thanks! I’ll take the downvotes as a good sign on this sub
In a bra, duh
Where do boo bees live?
I knew I was in the right place
Which metric to use is also related to how they are going to enforce it. Surely they won’t weigh cars. It’s more realistic to base it on makes.
Yeah, either that or someone having an EDM party
We never asked for this
I remember seeing this on Reddit a while ago. Doesn’t make it less fun, of course. Just saying.
Or the only person who phrases your issue this way) so many times I’ve found out that I just state my problem in an unusual way