• 0 Posts
  • 369 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • The idea of shooting any round at someone and expecting to “just wound them” is absurd, but .223/5.56 is definitely in the range of “reliably fatal if applied to the chest or head” .

    It might not be a “big boy round” but it’s still a rifle round – if wasn’t powerful enough to reliably “incapacitate” (i.e. kill) a human being at 100 yards the world’s militaries wouldn’t still be using after 40+ years.





  • oatscoop@midwest.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAmeruleica 🦀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    collapse

    Yeah … it almost certainly won’t. The world’s largest economy and millitary will still be unmatched, except now they’re under the control of mask-off christofascists. They’re evil, but unfortunately they’re not stupid.

    Everyone in the free world will be in for a bad time to varying degrees. I can promise you the new regime won’t be isolationists.





  • oatscoop@midwest.socialtoMemes@lemmy.mlWho needs Skynet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Any work made to convey a concept and/or emotion can be art. I’d throw in “intent”, having “deeper meaning”, and the context of its creation to distinguish between an accounting spreadsheet and art.

    The problem with AI “art” is it’s produced by something that isn’t sentient and is incapable of original thought. AI doesn’t understand intent, context, emotion, or even the most basic concepts behind the prompt or the end result. Its “art” is merely a mashup of ideas stolen from countless works of actual, original art run through an esoteric logic network.

    AI can serve as a tool to create art of course, but the further removed from the process a human is the less the end result can truly be considered “art”.