deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No, containers further isolate the network and hardware interaction of the process etc
Even if the tool works perfectly, you have to run it every time you change something. It’s not the end of the world, but it’s still much nicer to just have a macro to derive it at compile time.
I was worried about that with Arch, and yes the setup takes longer, but other than that for me it’s just been “run ‘pacman -Syu’ every few weeks” and otherwise forget, been running like that for a few years. So I’d still say it’s set and forget tbh, just that the set part is a bit more work.
It’s not hard, just if you’re doing it for a struct with a lot of fields it’s a lot of boilerplate
That’s not true, otherwise distillation would be impossible. You lose some water along with the alcohol but not the same percentage of both.
It’s not rational, it’s virtue signalling for the owning class. It’s saying “we are pious believers in the neoliberal order and we are happy to treat our employees like shit”.
Until they eventually do
He’ll be a grovelling serf, and probably not end up in the actual firing line
Holy racist Freud lol
Camelcase in python, ew, a fundamentalist would do that
And the appetite for change is so great that even those minor details are enough for people, but this campaign couldn’t even do that.
A populist won the election, yes, and that’s much more relevant than left or right.
The solution is absolutely for the democrats to move left, but not because it’s left, because people want to hear things about how their lives are going to improve.
Instead of blathering about an “opportunity economy” and more fuel for the war machine, they should be talking about higher wages, cheaper healthcare, cheaper housing, and cheaper eggs.
People who want to vote for the right wing already have a party to vote for, they’re not going to switch. This strategy just alienates people whose lives suck.
Political violence has sometimes led to good things
As a European, we shouldn’t be so quick to judge, we are only a few years behind them, and who is the greater fool, the fool or the one who follows the fool?
In 20 years millennials and gen z will be 30-60 year olds, you know, the people mostly in control of stuff
If someone “perceives they are losing out” because of doing something positive for women or minorities then that says a lot about their worldview, they are the ones responsible for polarisation there.
Agreed on the campaign though, it was the dems’ to lose and they royally fucked it up.
For entry to private events? I doubt it, it’s not just searching people randomly on the street.