lol

the problem is that in the vast majority of cases, designers aren’t involved. it’s just code monkeys trying their best to implement functionality but without UI/UX design they are barely usable by the average person. I guess just by its nature open source is less of a concept in design so you don’t get many volunteers. also designers are probably more averse to doing work for free since every goddamn costumer tries to get them to work for free.

I’ve never used a urinal. it’s weird and also some of them are disgusting, they almost guarantee splashback

edit: are, not ate

what do you mean lol were you born with a controller attached to your hands?

it’s one to one the same thing. they just moved the target. the so-called arguments about safety and purity are exactly the same.

don’t worry this is just normal tea I offer before I throw you off building

I think it’s appropriate specifically because musk is a transphobe himself.

bootlickers gonna bootlick

yeah that’s not extreme; it just doesn’t follow. you still have to have an analog. you can’t just say whatever to make an argument in the extreme. that’s just strawmanning.

easiest way to implement gun control, arm black people en masse and make sure to advertise it

“why don’t you respond to criticism”

no? how do you even think there’s a parallel there? gamer isn’t a race. there’s nothing essential about gaming. the parallel would be making generalizations about football fans. not a race.

i just read it and don’t think it applies here. the effect seems to apply to situations where the movement in one direction perpetuates itself, due to cyclic nature or outside influences.

if the democratic party wanted to, they could totally pull the overton window to the left. it’s not like there’s a perpetual demanded for the democratic party to move to the right; they just want to do it.

that’s all they do. why do you think they called everyone a pedophile. now they have one as a president, who is hiring Epstein’s pal as head of FDA and another predator as AG.

what you should be disappointed in is not being able to make an argument without strawmanning multiple times.

what you’re doing is just refusing to cooperate on language that’s already obvious and widely understood. it’s bad faith.

I think they were being sarcastic

based on how people use them, not ordained by the gods of language. people say pedophile to mean someone who rapes a minor.

“hey son, wanna monitor each other’s masturbation habits? you know, for God.”

the party of “they designed a virus to purposefully cull the population” and “let’s not have any measures against infectious diseases”. at the same time.

to be fair the army has historically been quite fond of it as well