A husband. A father. A senior software engineer. A video gamer. A board gamer.

  • 0 Posts
  • 332 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • Do we really want that?

    As long as competition and choice continues to be the mantra of the Linux desktop, then yes, I’d love to see more and more people using it.

    We have it pretty good right now. I would actually say we’re living in a golden age of desktop Linux: there’s constant innovation, good support, you get to do pretty much everything you need, while flying under the radar.

    Very true.

    Unwanted attention from Microsoft, who I bet are not going to be doing nice things once they start getting paranoid about it.

    I mean, Ballmer called Linux a cancer pretty early on, so that ship sailed a long time ago.

    I really don’t think that large companies like Adobe will care about Linux

    Once they start losing large sums of money due to people switching and finding viable alternatives, they certainly will care. Right now Adobe has one main thing going for them – apathy and muscle memory of the aging demographic of their users. That will eventually change.

    the least we get to interact with them the better.

    Absolutely. I used to be an Adobe fan, back when Kevin Lynch was a part of it, and I was a Flex developer. Then Jobs wrote his thing about Flash, and a year later, not a month after Jobs’s death, Adobe dumps Flex – and literally overnight my position changed from Flex to HTML5 and Java.








  • Everything said in that article makes me very happy to have switched to Firefox.

    Google can dress this up all they want, but a happy byproduct of this (for them) is that they can now purposefully ignore rules/filtering for their own sites, such as youtube, since it puts the real control of such filtering with the browser (and the company who created it) instead of the extension. Yes there is a trust concern with extensions. And yes, there is a performance hit with extensions vetting each network call. But that’s the price we, as the user, should continue to have the power to choose to pay, but Google is forcing us to go their way.

    Thanks Mozilla, for providing user choice.


  • You are right. They can’t for every distro.

    But fedora/rhel, Ubuntu/debian, and arch-based distros are the most commonly used. So they can provide official packages for those, and/or as the OP said, provide an official flatpak.

    And to be fair, it’s a nice-to-have to have a better sense of trust, but given the unofficial ones are open source, it’s quite likely any maliciousness would be rooted out very quickly.


  • ulkesh@beehaw.orgtoLinux@lemmy.mlI Tried Gaming on Linux...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    GloriousEggroll among a few others, and Valve of course, are the main reasons Linux gaming is now effectively solved (aside from anti-cheats where there’s nothing to do if some developers don’t want to support Linux).

    I haven’t yet watched the video, but I agree I’ve not needed to use Steam beta at all. While it’s around 70% of tracked games being labeled Gold or higher on protondb, I have found that with proton-ge, 100% of the games I’ve tried have worked without issue (on the order of 30ish games thus far).

    I won’t be going back to Windows, ever. So it kinda stinks that some devs just won’t support Linux for anti-cheat (like Lost Ark, etc). But it’s a price I’m willing to pay to not be spied on.