A constitutional amendment implies that the constitution doesn’t already cover this when, in its plain language, it definitely does. This provides an implicit concession that the court was right.

Don’t give them that. Pack the court and issue the opposite decision at the earliest opportunity.

We already oppose it. Shoot your guns if you’re not a fucking coward.

This also works for books assigned as homework.

Well another medieval thing we’re bringing back is not learning history

Yes, exactly.

Fucking guillotines already

OK I also briefly thought “our problem” but I’m actually PRETTY CONCERNED about the words “only goal” when I really think about it? “Only”, as in “Yeah, feeding on humanity is definitely ONE thing we’re shooting for, but come on guys, there’s lots of applications”

You know that Onion article, “No Way to Prevent This says only nation where this regularly happens” that was getting posted like 3 times a year, for a decade, and now it seems like we’re at the point where even The Onion won’t bother posting it any more?

The comic was posted a CENTURY AGO. Good work america. Literally sticking to your guns.

i dare you not to get scared or cum

most last only 2.1 second

dear god wtf

cat_paw_stop_posting.jpg

Shooting a gun is well within the president’s power. If he can shoot a gun with no consequences, Congress doesn’t have the ability to ignore shit.

I know the joke here is that we’re just in an endless cycle, but if this happened now and we reverted to stone age sun god worshippers, we’d find it a LOT harder to redevelop modern technology. We’ve literally plundered the reachable raw materials in the ground, and scoured the biomes.

The biomes would eventually recover (and become something new), but all that nice reachable coal is gone. We may not make it if that happens.

He can do that by officially assassinating the conservative SC justices, nominating new ones, and then having armed marines inside the senate comittees to ensure they are confirmed immediately.

There’s probably a few more steps, but this would get us back on track. He would have to be willing to give up his powers at a certain point, which means installing the legal apparatus (in the form of government officials) with the will to strip those powers.

It doesn’t really seem that hard to test? Emotions–at least in their occurrence and strength–are detectable with non-invasive brain scans. We’ve been doing that for ages. Put some electrodes on a baby, let them see their mommy, watch the graph spike until they turn away.

The argument “how could we know that about babies?” was used, for decades, to justify doing surgery on babies without anesthesia. They can’t talk, so who knows if they’re feeling pain or not. Guess we can safely assume they don’t. Point being, we don’t have to have a conversation with them about it to know why they’re doing something.

And there’s no solidarity like class solidarity. Remember Ellen Degeneres hanging out with Bush? Bruce Wayne would’ve been in that skybox too.

The example they set was “throw bricks at cops”, and I agree, the world should listen.

Donald Trump has never served anything except himself and maybe a few tennis balls.

There’s a missing 4th piece of poster board, that would be placed to the right.

It would have read:

ROOM
, YOU ASSHOLE

Why do I see so many of these accounts from reddthat?

God I fucking wish, do you know how many terrible politicians we’d be free of if it were?