• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are plenty of such parties. They are just not electorally successful on a national scale. They may be moderately influential on a state level through the use of fusion voting. Fusion voting is where multiple parties can stand the same candidate in an election.

    Most places in the United States use a “first-past-the-post” system. In this system, voters select one candidate and the candidate with the most votes wins. This system sounds fair on the surface but in reality, game theory dictates that the only stable configuration of political parties in such a system is a two-party system. In any other configuration, the individual actors will always find it more advantageous to join one of the two parties. The reason for this also explains why it’s hard for smaller parties to win under a first-past-the-post system.

    Suppose there are two existing political parties: Party A and Party B. Voters prefer Party A by a margin of 55-45, so Party A wins reliably in elections. Suppose we replay the same elections but with three parties. Party C holds similar views to Party A but is more extreme while Party A is more centrist. If everyone votes for their favourite candidate, then we will probably end up with a vote distribution where Party A wins 40% of the vote, Party B wins 45% of the vote, and Party C wins 15% of the vote. What has essentially happened here is that Party C siphoned votes away from Party A, causing Party B to win despite the fact that voters’ preferences haven’t changed. Voters know this and so even those who like the Party C candidate the most will vote for the Party A candidate (who shares at least some of their views) in order to stop Party B from winning.

    This is why progressives forming their own political party is a losing idea in the United States. It will split the left-wing vote and hand elections to the Republican Party. Instead, what they do is compete in the Democratic Party’s primary elections. In the US, who a party chooses to stand in a particular election is determined by means of a primary election. However, progressives often struggle to win intra-party primary elections because most members of the Democratic Party are moderate. The distribution of political leanings is shaped like a bell curve, and thus progressives like Bernie Sanders are simply outnumbered by moderates like Joe Biden. Moderates often have the numbers to sideline progressives in primary elections, and thus it is much more difficult for progressives to get elected since they need to run under the Democratic Party banner to stand any chance of winning.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Triangulation doesn’t actually work though, we’ve seen this since Clinton.

      If ideology existed on a spectrum and people voted for the closest ideological candidate, running one iota to the left of the opposition would win every election.

      What happens instead is your “moderate republicans” vote for fascism instead of diet-fascism, and the majority don’t vote because Diet-Fascism doesn’t offer them enough to make up missing a day of work.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Most members of the democrat party are moderate.

      You had me up until this statement.

      It’s simply not true. In fact, most Americans are progressive and support progressive policies.

      The issue is money in politics.

      Our political system is a system of legalized bribery in corruption.

      Most of the money in politics would be considered corruption and fraud in just about every first world country.

      But on the policy itself,

      Most Americans, including most democrat voters, are very progressive.

      Even Fox News viewers are progressive on most of the issues that Bernie Sanders campaigned on. Which is why he is so dangerous.

      We need to overturn citizens united and congress needs to legislate campaign finance reform.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most Americans, including most [Democratic] voters, are very progressive.

        I couldn’t find anything that isn’t 7 years old to substantiate this claim, but if you can, I’ll be happy to change my mind and edit my comment. There are certainly many popular progressive policies, but I don’t think that necessarily means they are progressive in general and will vote for progressive candidates.

        • DancingBear@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Policy wise, Americans are extremely progressive.

          Which football team political party they align themselves with is something completely different.

          This was true 7 years ago, and even more so today.

            • DancingBear@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sorry I don’t feel like spending an hour researching something I already have read about numerous times over the past few decades. It’s a general trend and it is actually increasing, although slowly.

              Feel free to look it up if you like though.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                I have, but I wasn’t able to find anything, which is why I asked. I totally understand if you don’t want to, and that’s totally fine. Maybe someone else will.