The push to hand-count ballots is ramping up, albeit with spotty success, as the 2024 election nears, according to a review by the Guardian and Votebeat. If more localities decide to try hand-counting in the November election, results could be inaccurate, untrustworthy or delayed, fostering more distrust in elections. In places that opt not to hand-count, supporters of the practice could use this choice as a reason to question or refuse to sign off on certification.

Either way, it raises the risk of throwing the 2024 election into chaos.

“It just gives additional grounds for calling into question the results of elections when there are no valid grounds,” said Heather Sawyer, executive director at American Oversight. “There’s no good reason to do it. And there’s lots of room for mischief and problems.”

The push hasn’t gained much ground in the large swing counties where Trump claimed votes were stolen from him. It’s been more effective in small or rural counties that voted heavily for Trump, where conservative activists have lined up at public meetings to repeat the conspiracies of Cook, Lindell and others. There – in MissouriNevadaPennsylvaniaTexas and Wisconsin – local officials voted to give hand-counting ballots a try in either their midterm or presidential primary elections.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    this isn’t a problem space where it’s a good solution

    Voting machines seem like a solution in search of a problem. Yes. We can do it, maybe we can even do it well. But that doesn’t make it better than paper ballots.