Well, if there was a valid reason for people to be upset at most the books that have been challenged/banned, then you could list the books that have been challenged/banned and the objections to them.
But the reason is bigotry and as such there is no list of valid reasons to be upset.
I also want to point out that if you read the fucking article it would have had the reasoning behind the challenges/bans in the article.
While I didn’t provide a site or some shit that had a list of books bigots found offensive, I answered your question. If you need a site to tell you that the queerphobes find books with queer topics offensive, I’m sorry that my three short paragraphs answering your question was at a third grade reading level and therefore too complex. To make it simpler, I’ll summarize it in one sentence:
Removed by mod
Well, if there was a valid reason for people to be upset at most the books that have been challenged/banned, then you could list the books that have been challenged/banned and the objections to them.
But the reason is bigotry and as such there is no list of valid reasons to be upset.
I also want to point out that if you read the fucking article it would have had the reasoning behind the challenges/bans in the article.
While I didn’t provide a site or some shit that had a list of books bigots found offensive, I answered your question. If you need a site to tell you that the queerphobes find books with queer topics offensive, I’m sorry that my three short paragraphs answering your question was at a third grade reading level and therefore too complex. To make it simpler, I’ll summarize it in one sentence:
bigots don’t like queer topics
Removed by mod
The reason they give for the bans, is that the books contain “pornography”. There is no actual pornography in the books.