Activists from around the country told The Intercept that they will advocate for an anti-war agenda at the convention in August and withhold their vote in November unless an adequate candidate steps up, listing policy priorities such as support for a permanent ceasefire and standing up to the pro-Israel lobby as it intervenes in Democratic primaries. Even as the Biden campaign insists that he will not step aside, many Democrats appear to be lining up behind Vice President Kamala Harris as an alternative candidate, with some Democratic governors being floated as well.

“My number one criteria for any candidate is opposing the genocide in Gaza,” said Saad Farooq, an uncommitted voter in Massachusetts. Farooq said it was unlikely that the Democratic National Committee would select any candidate who took a stance against Israel’s ongoing war, and that he would support Green Party candidate Jill Stein if she were to appear on the ballot in Massachusetts.

Will Dawson, an uncommitted voter in Washington, D.C., named several factors that could get him to switch his vote from the Green Party’s Stein to another politician. First on his list is a promise to call for an immediate ceasefire and fighting the influence of the pro-Israel lobby and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in Congress.

“This candidate would also ideally work toward pulling further away from the Israeli colonial project over time, with the goal being repealing our absurd financial support, ending the foreign interest agency of AIPAC, and pushing for a nation-wide boycott a la [South Africa] during their apartheid,” Dawson wrote.

The candidate would also have to push to reform the Supreme Court, he added. “The candidate would have to promise to both push for justice impeachment, and expand the courts,” Dawson said.“If a replacement candidate met both of these requirements, I would absolutely consider switching my vote from Jill Stein. Hell, I might even knock doors/canvass for them!”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Which is why we need to run a candidate with a shot of beating trump…

    It’s too important of an election to let Joe have one more go out of nostalgia.

    It would be easiest for everyone if he stepped aside, but he’s not willing to.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh look. Same person who shows up at any anti-Biden post trying to convince people not to vote for Biden, but stops just short of saying they want Trump to win.

      Let’s see all your “genocide Joe” type of comments directed to all the GOP members in Congress who happily support Israel’s efforts.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      It blows my mind that people can argue that Trump is the worst possible outcome for our country and the world, and then follow that up with “we need a candidate that can beat Trump”. If everyone knows what is at stake (democracy), how is Biden not capable of beating Trump? Do people think that not voting, or voting 3rd party is going to somehow keep Trump out of the white house? Anything but a vote for Biden (or whoever ends up on the ticket opposite Trump) is who everyone needs to vote for, or they have chosen Trump and doomed us all.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        Do you think it’s easier to convince 10s of millions of voter’s minds?

        Or get Joe Biden to understand that polls show people don’t want him and that the best thing he can do to prevent trump is step aside.

        Seriously.

        • bobburger@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Please provide some evidence to support your claim that the best thing Biden can do to prevent Trump getting elected is to step aside.

          • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The post-debate Data for Progress poll tested the odds of eight Democrats who have been floated as possible alternatives to Biden, including Vice President Kamala Harris and multiple Democratic governors. Biden’s self-proclaimed advantage is tempered by the lack of name recognition — so far — for the other options. Aside from Harris, prospective voters were so unfamiliar with these Democratic leaders that between 39 and 71 percent* *of respondents said they hadn’t heard enough about them to have an opinion. Even so, each potential candidate performed the same or even better than Biden.

            From this article and Link to the poll

            • bobburger@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              You kind of buried the lede there:

              Overall, these results show that voters continue to be concerned about Biden’s age — but there is not yet clear evidence that an alternative nominee would significantly outperform him against Trump in a head-to-head matchup.

              That’s evidence that some candidates poll similarly to Biden.

              That’s not evidence the best thing Biden can do to stop Trump from becoming president is drop out.

              • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Didn’t really bury it because I don’t agree with that analysis and it’s not part of the poll.

                If they’re polling similar to him with 39%-71% of the people not knowing who the candidate is that means their floor is where Biden is.

                • bobburger@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  …it’s not part of the poll.

                  That quote comes directly from the poll you linked.

                  …that means their floor is where Biden is.

                  That’s a specious conclusion you’re jumping to because it supports your biases. With out more information it’s more likely that once the respondents know who the candidates are the overall responses will fall in line with the population averages and the candidates polling results will be the same as they are now.

                  All we can confidently conclude for now is “39%-71% of people polled don’t know who the candidates in the polls were”.

                  • knightly@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    It doesn’t come from the poll, it comes from an analysis of the results of the poll.

                    Also, if your best candidate is polling at the same level as an unknown, generic member of the same party, then your best candidate is a nobody.

        • irreticent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I can’t say for certain what caused the injury, but I’m sure we can all agree that there is an injury.