aggelalex@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 months agoRegellemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1543arrow-down10
arrow-up1543arrow-down1imageRegellemmy.worldaggelalex@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaresaltnotsugar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up54·11 months agoWe now know that cars are not an effective anti-submarine countermeasure.
minus-squareeu@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up42·11 months agoNo, too many variables. We only know that a Volvo PV544 isn’t effective against that particular Swedish submarine. We now need to crash several different cars against several different submarines several times, for science!
minus-squareSkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·11 months agoWhat do you mean they had to scrap the submarine
minus-squareRose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 months agoNo, no. You just need to up the acceleration. Strap some rockets to that bastard, and let 'em go again.
We now know that cars are not an effective anti-submarine countermeasure.
No, too many variables. We only know that a Volvo PV544 isn’t effective against that particular Swedish submarine. We now need to crash several different cars against several different submarines several times, for science!
What do you mean they had to scrap the submarine
No, no. You just need to up the acceleration.
Strap some rockets to that bastard, and let 'em go again.