• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “But it’s just a few bad apples…” /s

      Like, yeah, maybe. But the expression is “one bad apple spoils the whole barrel”

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wait, that’s the full expression??

        I thought it was “one bad apples seeds the union before retiring on full pension after paying out victims’ families using tax dollars”

        We should really rethink how we select and train these police if we’ve been using that phrase wrong!

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The cowards are not the problem. The liars, murderers, and criminals are the problem.

  • Beaver [she/her]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The republicans in court are going to use the “but the camera is too far away to able to identify police abuse”

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is combined with the regular “you don’t know what happened before filming” is even worse.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can’t have more videos like the ones that make people angry about our out-of-control police getting out.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There’s actually a way to do that now.

      Use this filter in the BLE radar app: 00:25:DF:*

      That hex sequence is used exclusively by the taser company who happens to make all of the cameras for almost all of the police.

      It works fairly effectively, it spotted cops for me while I was driving past them on the freeway so I think that’s probably pretty good.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    They can’t hide things if it is on film! Gosh derned kids! It’s not like they can change their behavior, sheesh!

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean we don’t need to “come up” with anything, just make that asshole face the consequences of his actions…also lock up Cannon, she’s not fit to for public service.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago
    Propublica Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Name: Propublica Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/propublica/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    25 feet is about 9 steps away. Not super terrible, but as the article states, the cop is likely to decide 25 feet is how ever far he says it is.

    I actually agree that there should be some distance on the books, so a cop doesn’t have to worry about getting shoved or attacked or whatever while they’re dealing with someone else, but 25 feet is a bit excessive.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      You think there should be some distance on the books, but in point of fact the courts have already ruled in Arizona that you can’t put a set distance into law, not legally. The first amendment protects gathering news, which includes watching over the government, and any restrictions on the First Amendment have to be narrowly tailored to achieve their objectives. That is why we already have laws such as interference and obstruction. If you actually do something that prevents the cops from doing their job, it’s already a crime.

      The other problem with the set number of feet failed laws is abuse by police. The cops will say they felt you were too close, and that gives them reasonable suspicion to detain you and possibly probable cause to arrest you. Even if video evidence later shows that you were far enough away, you already took the ride. And what happens when a cop moves toward you? If you don’t back up fast enough, arrested. Even if the cop has no reason to move toward you, and it looks like entrapment, too bad. You’ll have to prove your own innocence.