The call spoofed Biden’s voice urging voters to stay home.

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Don’t do that again, now pay a cookie crumb for this highly illegal attempt to meddle with democracy”.

    Sigh.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The government doesn’t get to make up fines according to how heinous they feel the offense is. Their abilities are written in stone. This is why we see larger companies get off with a pittance, because it is a pittance to them.

      A great fix would be to levy fines based on annual revenue or profit, something like that. Suddenly a violation becomes real, not merely a cost of doing business.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve been saying for years that fines for these issues need to be based on revenue, not profit, and tripled. Unless they’re selling their products for a 300% profit margin, they still lose money because of the bullshit. Anything else can still be justified as a cost of business.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m curious. And I ask, because US politics has normalised what would be clear corruption in most other places:

    Is the illegal part here spoofing Biden, or also a private company trying to manipulate the electoral process?

    If its only the former, then, what an absolute shit show.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      A bit of both, but mostly about elections. The specific act used was “Truth in Caller ID Act by maliciously spoofing the number of a prominent local political consultant.”

      Though, the settlements also require the company to screen calls more aggressively and implement KYC.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Which telecom? I tried to read the article but got greeted with a broken, non-dismissible pop up that went off about having 848 intimate partners.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Firefox + uBlock Origin

      Kiwi browser + uBlock Origin on mobile

      Every now and then I see the web how everyone else sees it. Jesus Christ.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Does Firefox allow extensions now in mobile?

          (The answer is yes and no. Its must be an approved Firefox addon. Ublock is one of those, however all of the other scripts I use do not work in Firefox for Android. Kiwi still wins for me.)

          • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I believe that is no longer true. I just checked and it is letting me install any of the extensions.

            • Zoot@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Not for my scripts, I tried it while writing the comment just to be sure. Didn’t want to accidentally be wrong 😅

          • uranibaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s fair.

            I like to sync my history across devices. I sometimes open a link on my phone, leave it there and then pick it up on my computer via the account sync.

    • Adincar@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      According to the article they’re called Lingo Telecom. I’ve never heard of them (which is probably a good thing).

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Oh no, now we’ll have to cut some (non-executive) bonuses this year and skip a few pizza parties, the horror.”

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Let’s just cut 30 jobs to make it up within the year.

      But while we’re at it, might as well just round it up to cutting 600 jobs, right? Then we can still have those bonuses!