Everyone in the world knows that Jill Stein fully supports Russia. It’s been known since 2016, that was the point. Hence why I initially said I was going to write in a candidate…
You claimed my choice to write in was invalid, and I should be able to find a candidate that is anti-genocide.
I gave you the only option on my ballot against the Israeli genocide, we both agreed that Jill Steins support for Russias genocide also disqualifies her.
So this leaves the only option as write-in, right?
Yes, the point that I will not compromise on genocide and believe a vote thrown into the void is better than a vote for genocide.
Then shut up if your not going to do anything.
If by “do anything” you mean vote for a pro-genocide candidate then no I won’t do anything.
If by “do anything” you mean protest, contact representatives, do community work etc, then I will be doing something.
It should be easy to pick a candidate that you could feel good about voting for.
Yes, it should be. Unfortunately we live in a duopoly built on and now united around genocide.
My choices are Jill Stein or write in a candidate, as I’ve told you I’m leaning towards a write in.
Jill Stein is for the Ukrainian genocide though.
Well there you go, I’m left with a write in candidate as I suggested earlier.
I’m not surprised you didn’t know that.
Everyone in the world knows that Jill Stein fully supports Russia. It’s been known since 2016, that was the point. Hence why I initially said I was going to write in a candidate…
You claimed my choice to write in was invalid, and I should be able to find a candidate that is anti-genocide.
I gave you the only option on my ballot against the Israeli genocide, we both agreed that Jill Steins support for Russias genocide also disqualifies her.
So this leaves the only option as write-in, right?
I didn’t claim that, the constitution says it is.
The Constitution does not disallow write in votes. I think you’re confused.