It just goes to show how little you know or care about the candidates you’re promoting.
Mohammed Deif, for example, is on China’s side for their genocide of Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang which is absolutely disgusting.
Glad you circled back, so what did you mean when you said the Constitution would stop me from writing in a candidate? Pretty sure that goes to show you don’t even understand the constitution.
Are you going to stop me from writing them in or something? Lol (me)
I can vote for anyone I want, they just can’t win and hold office. (Me)
I’m not going to stop you but the constitution will. (You)
Why are you avoiding the fact that you’ve promoted two candidates so far, one who advocates for Russia’s genocide of Ukrainians and the other that advocates for China’s genocide of Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang which is absolutely disgusting?
Why are you avoiding the fact that you said the Constitution will not allow write ins? You’ve yet to answer.
Are you going to stop me from writing them in or something? Lol (me)
I can vote for anyone I want, they just can’t win and hold office. (Me)
I’m not going to stop you but the constitution will. (You)
I did not advocate for Jill Stein and I would love to see this proof of Mohammed Deif having literally anything to do with xinjiang, but first, answer my question and explain why you are lying about the constitution prohibitting write ins.
There is no googling which would link Mohammed Deif, the commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades in Palestine to xinjiang lmfao.
You refuse to provide anything because, just like with your insistence that the constitution would stop me from writing in my candidate, it’s not true.
You just say things to say them, talk yourself in circles, as I’ve been saying the whole time. You don’t care about any of this stuff, you just want to “own” someone online and are willing to lie and manipulate to do so.
I literally can’t make it any clearer then this so why I I engage in your accusation when you clearly are having troubles understanding a very basic fact?
Yes, then my very next message
Because Jill Stein is disqualified and I’m not
Then all the follow up messages where I make it very clear I don’t support her lol
It just goes to show how little you know or care about the candidates you’re promoting.
Mohammed Deif, for example, is on China’s side for their genocide of Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang which is absolutely disgusting.
Glad you circled back, so what did you mean when you said the Constitution would stop me from writing in a candidate? Pretty sure that goes to show you don’t even understand the constitution.
Why are you avoiding the fact that you’ve promoted two candidates so far, one who advocates for Russia’s genocide of Ukrainians and the other that advocates for China’s genocide of Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang which is absolutely disgusting?
Why are you avoiding the fact that you said the Constitution will not allow write ins? You’ve yet to answer.
I did not advocate for Jill Stein and I would love to see this proof of Mohammed Deif having literally anything to do with xinjiang, but first, answer my question and explain why you are lying about the constitution prohibitting write ins.
Just Google it, I’m not going to hold your hand if you can’t do basic research.
It does explain your views and how you stand for pro-genocide candidates as long as they genocide the right people.
There is no googling which would link Mohammed Deif, the commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades in Palestine to xinjiang lmfao.
You refuse to provide anything because, just like with your insistence that the constitution would stop me from writing in my candidate, it’s not true.
You just say things to say them, talk yourself in circles, as I’ve been saying the whole time. You don’t care about any of this stuff, you just want to “own” someone online and are willing to lie and manipulate to do so.
You (the pro-genocide one)
Me (the harm reduction person)
I literally can’t make it any clearer then this so why I I engage in your accusation when you clearly are having troubles understanding a very basic fact?