He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

  • Willy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Ur a bot. I can tell by the pixels unicode.

    Edit: joking aside you bring up a good point and our security through anonymity cultural irrelevance will not last forever. Or maybe it will.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Unfortunately it won’t, assuming Lemmy grows.

      Lemmy doesn’t get targeted by bots because it’s obscure, you don’t reach much of an audience and you don’t change many opinions.

      It has, conservatively, ~0.005% (Yes, 0.005%, not a typo) of the monthly active users.

      To put that into perspective, theoretically, $1 spent on a Reddit has 2,000,000x more return on investment than on Lemmy.

      All that needs to happen is that number to become more favorable.