Jesus, this guy gets dumber and more dementia addled by the day.
It’s illegal to not buy one? Does that mean we all have to buy one now? Lol
Suck my balls. The US constitution says differently, little piss baby.
And not a single journalist will ask him what law he claims has been broken.
Does he still take questions from journalists? I thought they were only letting sycophants in as ‘press’
which critics said resembled a Nazi salute.
There’s journalists right now getting murdered for standing up to tyranny and this spineless ass-kissing ball-gargling excuse of a tabloid writer is excusing Nazis.
Journalists employers are all friends. This Makes it nearly impossible to for journalists in large orgs to stand up to oligarchs. Although it does make for great pageantry for non-billionaires.
“we believe in the free market”
“NO NOT LIKE THAT”
Fellas, is it illegal to have no money to buy something?
oh wait
read news article about a homeless man getting shot 50 times
👀
I think what he wants is all our 401k by law having to invest in Telsa stock. I wouldn’t put it past him to lauch an EO demanding that.
If the king don’t like it…
I’m sure Trump saying liberals have to buy Teslas will drive up sales… how could that possibly fail?
Declaring a boycott as illegal is itself illegal and a violation of the 1st Amendment 🌷🌈🖕
The republican controlled congress will impeach any minute now…
Any. minute. Now.
Bad news, there’s precedent for making boycotts illegal, though that’s based on a deliberate misreading of hate speech laws
I was actually reading this wikipedia page earlier after posting and it seemed like these Anti-BDS laws only apply to government offices and government contractors
Most anti-BDS laws have taken one of two forms: contract-focused laws requiring government contractors to promise that they are not boycotting Israel; and investment-focused laws, mandating public investment funds to avoid entities boycotting Israel.
A broad law mandating that the public at large can’t not buy certain products, or can’t ask others to do the same would be unenforceable I would think – though I’m not going to doubt the Roberts Court ability to find some way to make something that absurd law if asked by their king…
Maybe you should read the news instead of wikipedia? Maybe you should check reality instead of what’s supposedly “legal”?
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181218-texas-teacher-fired-for-refusing-to-sign-anti-bds-oath/
It’s been decades of these attacks and they’ve laid the foundation for the expansions that we’re seeing now.
Uh same to you? Did you check up on how that case from 2018 ended? She won and they changed the law, and the latest I found with a quick search is that CAIR was appealing to get Texas to pay her the compensation she was owed from the original trial but denied because since the state changed the law Texas was arguing they no longer had to pay the original amount awarded (typical Texas, big fuck you to Ken Paxton)
The original law in Texas that got Bahia Amawi fired was amended in 2019 to avoid targeting individuals and only apply to companies applying or bidding for contracts greater than $100,000.
(WASHINGTON, DC, 4/5/2022) – The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, argued yesterday before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on behalf of Bahia Amawi, defending an Austin, Texas, federal court’s decision to award Amawi more than $140,000 for costs and attorney fees after winning her landmark First Amendment victory against the State of Texas, which found Texas’s Anti-BDS law unconstitutional.
Did you have another example?
Maybe Trump doesn’t know what the word “illegal” means 
Oh, he knows. It’s his middle name.
I’m more blown away by the communism level planned economy lately.
I don’t even understand how a boycott would be illegal. It’s illegal to not buy products from a certain company? How can you tell if a person is not buying because they’re boycotting or because they never had the intention of buying in the first place?
Everyone’s actually required to buy a Tesla now or else they’re gonna be in really big trouble
Lol tell that to the zios.
So, do I turn myself in, or just wait for someone to call the authorities?
I think I’ll wait.
FEDS HERE HE IS! HE’S BOYCOTTING TESLA!
Noooooooooooooooooo!
SEIZE EVERYONE WHO DOESN’T OWN A TESLA
DEPORT
AI slop, sadly
However, the billionaire’s increasing government influence has aligned with a global decline in Tesla sales, leading some to believe his political moves are damaging the company’s brand.
For me, the Tesla brand is permanently damaged. I will never buy a Tesla. I don’t care if they’re good EVs, I don’t care if they’re the best EVs, I will never buy one.
The thing is they aren’t even good EVs.
Pretty decent dumpsters, though.
Raccoon approved apparently!
Like it wasn’t “damaged” before, even from the start… It has always been bad.
No, the roadster was really cool, the S was neat too, then the 3 being at a relatively good price point really pushed the market toward EVs in general. I am glad for that at least.
From the guy who knows all about illegal.
what does that mean lol is everyone required by law to buy a tesla
It means Trump doesn’t like it. And Trump can go fuck himself with a chainsaw. Despite his delusions, his word isn’t law. It’s just a flood of lies, threats and bullshit.
What is this article? “critics said resembled a Nazi salute”? Fuck off, Nazi apologists. He did a Nazi salute. It happened.
No, he did TWO Nazi salutes. One right after another.
Nowadays we’re all under Leon’s watchful eye. He’ll call out billionaires and straight-up fabricate shit about them. He knows no one is gonna come at him in any meaningful way. If anyone should manage to get on his radar (camera, whatever lol… Had to throw in a stupid Tesla joke) they will be thrust into the public eye where he’s comfortable and in control of the narrative enough to intimidate most into submission. He is big brother now, and it couldn’t be stupider
Liberalism -> Fascism.
