This is the new flavor of lazy journalism. How many headlines do you see like “Senator X SLAMS so and so in a FURIOUS conversation” and then you click through and there’s some mundane talk in congress. Or, “So and so has a MELTDOWN live in front of blah blah” and same thing. This article takes something that is probably not good (scientists leaving the US), picks a single example and then makes a case that this is generalized.
The way this makes me feel is that if I go to the ice cream stand and watch a child accidentally drop their ice cream, then go home and pen “ICE CREAMS being DROPPED all over the US! Can this happen to you?”
Basically, instead of real journalism we get clickbait. The linked article isn’t the worst example of this, however, it’s a trend that has frustrated me to no end.
This is the new flavor of lazy journalism. How many headlines do you see like “Senator X SLAMS so and so in a FURIOUS conversation” and then you click through and there’s some mundane talk in congress. Or, “So and so has a MELTDOWN live in front of blah blah” and same thing. This article takes something that is probably not good (scientists leaving the US), picks a single example and then makes a case that this is generalized.
The way this makes me feel is that if I go to the ice cream stand and watch a child accidentally drop their ice cream, then go home and pen “ICE CREAMS being DROPPED all over the US! Can this happen to you?”
Basically, instead of real journalism we get clickbait. The linked article isn’t the worst example of this, however, it’s a trend that has frustrated me to no end.