• PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, men have for a long time been the ones responsible for putting food on the table, paying the rent, building houses, cars, etc. and maintaining them, going to war to defend the country, mowing the lawn, and keeping society running.

    Also, hilarious of you to accuse me of misogyny and then basically saying “women are responsible for doing traditionally female jobs”. LOL.

    LMAO, even.

      • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps in the past, but nowadays women are totally free to become soldiers, farmers, butchers, construction workers, electricians, bus drivers, or garbage collectors. Yet all of those jobs are still overwhelmingly done by men. And if men didn’t do them, there would be no houses, no roads, no electricity, and no food.

        • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Men sexually harass women who do those things in the workplace, and they still have to cook your food and wipe your bum when they get home

          • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they do not. Women do not have to stay in abusive relationships. They can go to court and get a restraining order, a divorce, or sue their employer if they are harassed at the workplace. No one is forcing them to stay in these types of situations. If they chose to do so anyways, they have no one but themselves to blame.

            • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah, the good old “systemic oppression doesn’t exist because free will”

              Next you’re gonna say women who are forced by the state to carry pregnancies to term can just choose not to raise their kids

                  • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So you’re saying it’s immoral to give up a child for adoption when you are unable to raise it, but it’s not immoral to abort it before it even has a chance to take its first breath?