Don’t want to endorse Christianity necessarily but hard to get around saying the word Christmas or Xmas, so is Xmas more rebellious? Is there an even more rebellious or irreverent name for it?

Also, should I not even celebrate Christmas? What’s an alternative that features the presents-giving at the same time of year but in a way that isn’t tied in any way to religion (and ideally doesn’t involve killing turkeys)?

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    Apparently saying “happy holidays” is rebellious enough to send some folks into unhinged rants about “the war on Christmas” lol

  • metostopholes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    Despite what crazy right wing pundits say, “Xmas” is Christian. Chi (Χ) is the first letter of “Christ” written in the Greek alphabet. (Χριστός)

    • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      For me it will always be synonymous to extreme sports, i’m always picturing Jesus and Santa Claus doing sick snowboard tricks

  • Lnrdrople
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why does it need to be rebellious? Sounds a little childish. Just roll with “happy holidays” or whatever and celebrate and let others celebrate whatever they want. Celebrating at this time of year has nothing to do with Christianity really, it’s much older tradition.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you wanna be rebellious around Christmas, all you gotta do is serve somebody a coffee in a red paper cup.

    But that aside, both “Christmas” and “Xmas” are equally religious. The X in “Xmas” is actually meant to be the initial for Christ’s name in Greek (Χριστός), so it’s still ultimately the same thing as saying “Christmas”.

  • SalsaGal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    Xmas was never intended to be a more secular alternative, it was originally created by scribes wanting to save space so they used the first letter of Christ in Greek, “Χριστός”.

  • key@lemmy.keychat.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Christmas has been secularized for decades, really don’t need to be Christian to celebrate it. Especially since Jesus was probably born in the summer, the early church adopted Dec 25 to make it easier to convert people used to celebrating Saturnalia.

    Festivus is maybe the best known totally non-religious December holiday. Or new years.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Do you know where the summer estimate came from? I don’t think it’s unlikely Christmas was moved. But I thought from when the division of abijah was on duty the 6 months plus 9 months put it either in either December or June. (The division of abijah was on duty twice a year) But that’s just from a conversation I had with someone, I don’t have great source for it either.

      • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        What you’re talking about is a calculation based on the birth of John the Baptist. John the Baptist’s father was a priest in the order of Abijah and John the Baptist was conceivced with his father’s barren wife as a reward for his service in the temple. His service would have ended in June. The angel Gabriel visited Mary in the sixth month of that pregnancy to tell her that she would birth Jesus. The calculation is June + 6 = Dec + 9 = September.

        December is definitely not the correct month because the story has shepherds tending their flocks in the field. Sheep have to be brought in from the field for the winter months and would not have been in the field in December. They would have been moved to shelter no later then the end of October.

        The year is also problematic. Jesus was born during the reign of King Harrod who died in 4BCE. And during a mass killing of babies which, if it happened at all, would have occurred at least a couple of years before Harrod’s death.

        It’s also worth saying that there isn’t good evidence for Jesus having ever existed at all. It seems most likely that he did and was a reformist rabbi that the myth was built around but no one apparently wrote anything about him for a century or two after his death.

  • verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I think christmas has lost it’s religious connotations, nobody I know thinks of it as a religious holiday at all. It’s just a time for giving gifts, showing love and spending time with meaningful people in your life.

    If you want a catch all though “Happy Holidays” covers it.

  • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Surprised nobody has posted Newtonmas. Celebrate a historical figure who had major impacts on our civilization by advancing science, and who was actually born on December 25!

  • rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would argue that in some ways, coopting these words and the nonreligious traditions would be excellent because it removes power from “them.”