![](https://quokk.au/pictrs/image/26da5988-9c5f-475c-a451-69bed7d67323.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Shooting bullets provided by the US.
Shooting bullets provided by the US.
Yeah but violence against Nazis is bad now?
deleted by creator
And with stuff like Anything LLM you can self host an entirety local multimodal agent in a handful of clicks.
The irony is these politicians have all supported or are directly responsible for state sanctioned murder through the armed forces.
Like you literally have a monopoly on violence and murder, the fuck you saying it’s not okay?
Israel is a terror state, armed and funded by the US.
The difference between non-ML tankie communism and anarchism is the means of getting there.
Communists want a vanguard state to slowly whittle away.
Anarchists want to skip that step.
There is literally death, suffering, and we’re heading towards some sort of fucked up techno feudalism today. Like we don’t need a revolution for that, that’s the path we’re currently heading towards without one.
Revolution isn’t pretty but just as when we overthrew monarchs, the end result and saving of future lives justifies it.
Good. The system is fucked.
Let it collapse and we can work on a new system without hundreds of years of entrenched rich elites deciding it.
Someone needs to give this type of god game/digital pet game another go. This is the sort of stuff that would be perfect on VR.
This isn’t technology and stop spamming your shitty tankie news site everywhere.
Mozilla pays its CEOs millions and millions of dollars. They exist to get funding from Chrome to look like there is competition in the industry.
You mean global north/ global south.
Developing and developed are considered negatively.
But in terms of laypeople words, that are used every day, 1st and 3rd world mean the same thing.
You’re thinking of ML tankies.
Communism is a stateless, classless, system where people enact mutualism and socialism without state coercion.
… Riiiightio
Yes and what about it?
Socialists would be in favour of state ownership of resources.
Anarchists and communists wouldn’t be in favour of a state.
What do progressives value about state ownership of utils, are they for it, against it?
TIL: Way too many people think it’s still the Cold War. Language changes people.
Nope that was apparently too confusing, now we say global north and global south.
It’s a much better system, see Australia in the south of the globe, is in the global north for instance. It just makes perfect sense.
What, progressives are in favour of state owned utils or aren’t? Explain yourself properly.
Oh no the “liberal media who doesn’t care” quick let’s all concern ourselves with the feelings of right wingers who were going to support Trump regardless and attack anyone else over anything real or fake.
What’s with the fucking pandering and worry over magats thoughts.
Here’s what I say to the failed opportunity: