Smaller subscription deals and the underperformance of certain titles have had a severe impact on Devolver and TinyBuild, says stockbroking firm Goodbody.

Both companies floated at the peak of the games business in 2021 and have seen their share prices plummet over the past two years. Devolver has seen its share price drop 92% since its peak in January 2022, while TinyBuild’s has fallen 95%

“We have seen from Devolver and TinyBuild that subscription is under pressure at the moment,” says Patrick O’Donnell, technology and video gaming analyst at Goodbody.

"The cheques coming from Sony and Microsoft are just not as big as they were. And that creates problems if you’re concentrated on that side of the market.

“TinyBuild, of all of them, was most exposed. Devolver was exposed, but not quite as much.”

  • BB69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did a lot of indie devs flock to gamepass’s defense then?

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Likely because when the big games weren’t part of it yet, they were getting good payouts.

      But as soon as you throw in one elephant into the pool, let alone a dozen, the rest of the swimmers are gonna have a lot less water to swim in.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have gamepass but I also use to be a regular Destiny player. A single time sink like Destiny can leave very little time for anything else. Since I stopped playing Destiny I have been playing a lot more indie games.

    • ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cause a lot of indie devs are also idiots when it comes to business decisions. Many (especially solo devs) didn’t get into the industry to make boatloads of money; they are often creative types who are passionate about their work.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably same reason they defended being bought off by epic for exclusivity, short term stability at the cost of long term survivability.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indie devs are probably gonna get their bread now and think about the future later. They don’t know if they can get a single game out.

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did those devs already have a deal in place? Were they hoping to get a good deal in the future?

      What were those devs saying when they defended Gamepass?

    • Aielman15@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A lot of gaming sites asked developers whose games were on GamePass what they thought of it, and the answer was predictable. Like, nobody is going to ill talk the provider of the service their game is on.

      Other developers didn’t speak ill of it because of the fear of burning bridges, I suppose.

      The Game Bakers (Furi, Haven) talked about their difficult relationship with GP on Vice (LINK).

      “Game Pass is such a fantastic platform for players,” said Leprince, “so there are possibly more Xbox players than ever interested in indie games. Unfortunately, without Game Pass, it is also very hard for many indie games to be visible on Xbox.”

      Basically, the problem with a subscription service such as GP is that it cannibalizes other games’ sales outside the service itself. And since you are not guaranteed to land on GP, developing a game Xbox may be more of a gamble than it is on other platforms. I fear this may become the norm as more subscription services are rolled out and start encroaching the market.

      There’s also the problem with founding. Furi sold 78% of its copies through PS+, yet only one third of its budget was paid by Sony for the deal. Developers have to decide whether they need less money immediately, or potentially more money down the line; but for indie developers, sometimes there is no choice: they either accept the deal, or shut down because they don’t have the founding to complete their next game.

      I really like the Vice article I linked because it’s one of the very few who tried to analyze the situation impartially, with data backing it up. Most of the other industry journalists at the time were like “GP is the future! Gamers spend less and everyone gains more money!!1!”, parroting Spencer’s bullshit.