IMO, The US has crumbling infrastructure, corrupt government, dangerous cities, and a lot of homelessness, among so many other problems. Hell, millions of people in the US don’t even have power right now.

What’s the difference?

  • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yup, it does change. It was attempted to mean “poor” and it’s been reappropriated since

    If you’re trying to use modern language, it’s “developed” and “developing”

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You mean global north/ global south.

      Developing and developed are considered negatively.

      But in terms of laypeople words, that are used every day, 1st and 3rd world mean the same thing.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        North/south imply certain regions can’t improve and is far worse than developed/developing

        If layperson words didn’t have an issue with 1st/3rd world, you wouldn’t see so many comments about it