• RubicTopaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    He would actually advance working class interests though, and all billionaire/corporate funding to the Democrats would be cut off as a result; Dems wouldn’t let that happen.

    That’s the point of liberal “democracies” after all: keeping capitalists in power.

    Get organized, that excuse of a democracy won’t save you.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        You need a congealed working class before you can have a democracy. Right now, we have a fractured and alienated working class, so all we get are the motions.

        • Gigantic voting districts where elected officials are lucky to know one constituent in 10,000.
        • Systematic disenfranchisement of young voters, poc, and the internally displaced.
        • Strict limits placed on individual bureaucrats who must pander to the broadly empowered private business interests.
        • A fully captured court system that can tip the scales of an election.
        • No regional autonomy. No public civil defense. No guarantee of political education. No right to free association of labor.

        How do you engage with a democracy on those terms? What democracy is there to engage with? An election that is simply another consumer choice isn’t democratic. You still have no control over what you’re being offered and no participation on how the system is administered.

        • NeilBru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What you’ve listed are critiques. I agree with many of them. What I’m asking specifically is if not democracy, then what instead?

          On paper, the United States is a federal republic, that votes for representatives for a bicameral parliamentary system that derives jurisprudence from English Common Law.

          In practice, it’s a plutocratic oligarchy.

          For context, I consider myself to be a market socialist who still wants a representative federal republic for the United States.

          I have my own ideas for re-enfranchisement for the working class:

          • abolish “first-past-the-post”
          • restructure gerrymandered voting districts
          • implement ranked choice voting
          • constitutional amendment for term limits for every elected position
          • allow cross-party voting in primaries
          • abolishing Citizens United (what a cynically ironic name for what it actually allows for)

          These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot, given the average citizen’s knowledge of civics, political theory, economics, and statistics but it’s what I believe can work.

          Or would you prefer autocracy? The “dictatorship of the proletariat”? Monarchy? Theocracy? Anarchy? Oligarchy? Syndicalism?

          My ultimate point is that you seem to still want “democracy”, but you want it in practice, not just on paper, despite your claim of the point of democracies is to “keep capitalists in power”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot

            Politics is the art of the possible. The entire job of political leadership is to advocate for policy change.

            • NeilBru@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Again, My question to you is if not democracy, then what? Or do you actually want democracy? Please propose your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Or do you actually want democracy?

                I want good policy.

                If my democracy is producing bad candidates and bad policies, what purpose does it serve?

                your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.

                Capitalism is serviced by the illusion of choice in a functional monopoly. The solution is to break up the monopoly.

                But that’s a Herculean task.

  • pinkystew@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The elites cackling at Bernie’s funeral: he told them exactly what the problem was and how to fix it and they ignored him LOLOLOLOL

  • frengo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Italiano
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    This man would be TOO good for any country. His visions are out of this world, he would have a lot of powerful enemies. Americans would probably kill him in the first month of an hypothetical presidency.

    • Numberone@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      It helps when their brain isn’t actively dripping out of their ears😁. But yeah, wouldn’t you rather have someone who you actually agree with that’s old? Besides, Bernie would have won 2016 if anything, he was almost a decade younger at that point.

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        most geriatric ears are loaded with enough hairs to at least slow down any leakage. i can agree with the ideas of some geriatrics sure but there have been quite a few ive been loathe to share the planets oxygen with. most of them in politics. for every decent one like bernie, there are at least 6 that are diametrically aligned.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bernie Sanders told me to vote for Hilary Clinton so I voted for Hilary Clinton.

      And then Bernie Sanders told me to vote for Joe Biden so I voted for Joe Biden.

      And then Bernie Sanders told me to vote for Kamala Harris so I voted for Kamala Harris.

      And now Trump is President again.

      I’m beginning to think this guy might not have all the answers.

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        correct answers are wholly dependent on factual, unadultrrated, information. trumps crew is populated by numerous adulterers so the game id rigged at the outset

      • RobMyBot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        He endorsed the best chance there was to stop fascists from taking power. To do anything else would’ve been stupid.

        It’s not his fault the dems keep royally fucking it up. It’s not like he has any decision-making power in their party.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          He endorsed the best chance there was to stop fascists from taking power

          He endorsed them as a last resort when all else had failed. And he immediately became a scapegoat for Clinton after she, too, failed.

          What makes Sanders good isn’t his relentless flogging of the turds the DNC push out every four years.

          It’s not his fault the dems keep royally fucking it up

          No. But I dread to see what kind of hack he’s replaced with when he retires

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s almost as if younger politicians with similar policy goals have been actively suppressed…

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, everyone collectively agree to say only one thing. You’re on a discussion forum for fucks sake!

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          No one reported your comment, no one asked you to delete it, it hasn’t been removed…you’re being tolerated, you’re just not getting approval. You’re not entitled to people’s approval.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trump being the youngest at 78 is already too old if you ask me. If the US had a ceremonial presidency like many parliamentary republics then that’d be fine but for an active head politician that’s just too old imo

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I agree 100% we needed him. If you asked me 8 years ago I’d even say I honestly believe we, as Americns, deserve him. I’m now very seriously wondering that. It’s starting to feel like we don’t. Im against collective punishment so I don’t mean to say that implies people who are going to suffer from this deserve their suffering, but I’m not sure that implies we deserve a politician like him. Glad as hell we have him in whatever office we can though.

    • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just because the shitstains that voted trump dont deserve him doesn’t mean the rest of us dont.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The DNC needs to go. All of it. Literally just gone. There needs to be a real left grassroots party that maintains a much more tight ideological vision and focuses internally.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      He won’t. He knows splitting the D vote will guarantee an R win. Unlike many voters who think they’re making a statement.

        • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Then, unfortunately, you are with the republicans. I’m personally looking forward to the DNC primaries in 2-3 years. Maybe we’ll see the next Bernie take a stance. The point is, the DNC primaries are where you should make your point.

          • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m not American, but because their politics looms so large I’m kind of forced to pay attention. And I have to say, I’m real fucking bored of waiting for the Democrats to back the next Bernie. I swear I’ve been reading about The Next Bernie since they shafted The Original Bernie in 2016.

            • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Well, buckle up. Progress is slow, but if we’re very lucky we’ll see some within our lifetimes. Not in the next 4 years tho.

              • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                And this is why the DNC must be destroyed.

                You can’t get Americans to vote if you are just like “you don’t deserve an interesting candidate, not in 4 years, not ever” this has been the fucking case since 2016. The DNC had ample time, but they’ve done nothing but drop the ball.

          • khaliso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s really fucking tiring to see you americans singing along to the tune of the ‘us vs them’ rhethoric.

            I don’t know what he has planned, but in my book he’s the most likely candidate to break the 2-party system.

            • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Jokes on you, I’m not American at all! I suppose it takes a certain number of years on the planet to see that the 2-party system is not going anywhere. You just have to accept to play within the constraints and hope to get the best you can.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      He already did, didn’t you see the refreshing band of green next to his name amid all the red and blue? He generally votes the same as the Dems though.

  • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    I could be wrong but polling I’ve seen says 83% of black men and 93% black women voted Democrat. Latinos and White people voted closer to 50% between the two parties

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Latinos were the biggest loss as far as I can tell. There is a host of reasons why this group crumbled.

      Let’s see how they like seeing family members deported.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not just family members.

        If you and your entire family are suddenly thrown in a cage, who are you gonna call to grab your birth certificate from the safe deposit box?