Sanders put out a statement today:
“Bernie is too old to be president” immediately votes in people just as old 3 times in a roe
Trump being the youngest at 78 is already too old if you ask me. If the US had a ceremonial presidency like many parliamentary republics then that’d be fine but for an active head politician that’s just too old imo
We coulda had a bad bitch.
You need to save these things for future use
If only we could go back in time and make Bernie the Dem candidate and save Harambe.
Not just Harambe, but also Peanut.
He would actually advance working class interests though, and all billionaire/corporate funding to the Democrats would be cut off as a result; Dems wouldn’t let that happen.
That’s the point of liberal “democracies” after all: keeping capitalists in power.
Get organized, that excuse of a democracy won’t save you.
So instead of democracy, then what, in your opinion?
You need a congealed working class before you can have a democracy. Right now, we have a fractured and alienated working class, so all we get are the motions.
- Gigantic voting districts where elected officials are lucky to know one constituent in 10,000.
- Systematic disenfranchisement of young voters, poc, and the internally displaced.
- Strict limits placed on individual bureaucrats who must pander to the broadly empowered private business interests.
- A fully captured court system that can tip the scales of an election.
- No regional autonomy. No public civil defense. No guarantee of political education. No right to free association of labor.
How do you engage with a democracy on those terms? What democracy is there to engage with? An election that is simply another consumer choice isn’t democratic. You still have no control over what you’re being offered and no participation on how the system is administered.
What you’ve listed are critiques. I agree with many of them. What I’m asking specifically is if not democracy, then what instead?
On paper, the United States is a federal republic, that votes for representatives for a bicameral parliamentary system that derives jurisprudence from English Common Law.
In practice, it’s a plutocratic oligarchy.
For context, I consider myself to be a market socialist who still wants a representative federal republic for the United States.
I have my own ideas for re-enfranchisement for the working class:
- abolish “first-past-the-post”
- restructure gerrymandered voting districts
- implement ranked choice voting
- constitutional amendment for term limits for every elected position
- allow cross-party voting in primaries
- abolishing Citizens United (what a cynically ironic name for what it actually allows for)
These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot, given the average citizen’s knowledge of civics, political theory, economics, and statistics but it’s what I believe can work.
Or would you prefer autocracy? The “dictatorship of the proletariat”? Monarchy? Theocracy? Anarchy? Oligarchy? Syndicalism?
My ultimate point is that you seem to still want “democracy”, but you want it in practice, not just on paper, despite your claim of the point of democracies is to “keep capitalists in power”.
These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot
Politics is the art of the possible. The entire job of political leadership is to advocate for policy change.
Again, My question to you is if not democracy, then what? Or do you actually want democracy? Please propose your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.
Or do you actually want democracy?
I want good policy.
If my democracy is producing bad candidates and bad policies, what purpose does it serve?
your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.
Capitalism is serviced by the illusion of choice in a functional monopoly. The solution is to break up the monopoly.
But that’s a Herculean task.
Democracy is the answer, democrats are not.
We need a real progressive party
deleted by creator
I agree 100% we needed him. If you asked me 8 years ago I’d even say I honestly believe we, as Americns, deserve him. I’m now very seriously wondering that. It’s starting to feel like we don’t. Im against collective punishment so I don’t mean to say that implies people who are going to suffer from this deserve their suffering, but I’m not sure that implies we deserve a politician like him. Glad as hell we have him in whatever office we can though.
Just because the shitstains that voted trump dont deserve him doesn’t mean the rest of us dont.
Nowhere did I imply not deserving Sanders means we deserve Trump, in fact I specifically said we don’t deserve collective punishment.
The DNC needs to go. All of it. Literally just gone. There needs to be a real left grassroots party that maintains a much more tight ideological vision and focuses internally.
If Bernie Sanders leaves the Democratic Party i will follow him.
He’s actually an independent, he just works with the Dems to get shit done.
when they aren’t directly obstructing him
He already did, didn’t you see the refreshing band of green next to his name amid all the red and blue? He generally votes the same as the Dems though.
He won’t. He knows splitting the D vote will guarantee an R win. Unlike many voters who think they’re making a statement.
At this point i think i am done with the Democratic Party.
Then, unfortunately, you are with the republicans. I’m personally looking forward to the DNC primaries in 2-3 years. Maybe we’ll see the next Bernie take a stance. The point is, the DNC primaries are where you should make your point.
I’m not American, but because their politics looms so large I’m kind of forced to pay attention. And I have to say, I’m real fucking bored of waiting for the Democrats to back the next Bernie. I swear I’ve been reading about The Next Bernie since they shafted The Original Bernie in 2016.
Well, buckle up. Progress is slow, but if we’re very lucky we’ll see some within our lifetimes. Not in the next 4 years tho.
And this is why the DNC must be destroyed.
You can’t get Americans to vote if you are just like “you don’t deserve an interesting candidate, not in 4 years, not ever” this has been the fucking case since 2016. The DNC had ample time, but they’ve done nothing but drop the ball.
All right. Well good luck destroying the DNC.
It’s really fucking tiring to see you americans singing along to the tune of the ‘us vs them’ rhethoric.
I don’t know what he has planned, but in my book he’s the most likely candidate to break the 2-party system.
Jokes on you, I’m not American at all! I suppose it takes a certain number of years on the planet to see that the 2-party system is not going anywhere. You just have to accept to play within the constraints and hope to get the best you can.
That what i said. I would follow Bernie Sanders
We never got to feel the Bern… :(
The elites cackling at Bernie’s funeral: he told them exactly what the problem was and how to fix it and they ignored him LOLOLOLOL
I could be wrong but polling I’ve seen says 83% of black men and 93% black women voted Democrat. Latinos and White people voted closer to 50% between the two parties
Latinos were the biggest loss as far as I can tell. There is a host of reasons why this group crumbled.
Let’s see how they like seeing family members deported.
Not just family members.
If you and your entire family are suddenly thrown in a cage, who are you gonna call to grab your birth certificate from the safe deposit box?
More importantly, many of them (up to 12M, counting is still ongoing) stayed at home.
Don’t you all worry your pretty little heads about any of this. In 4 years, the DNC will pick yet another anointed candidate for you to fall in line behind like good little boys and girls. And you all will dance and scream for joy and you will punish and cast out any who show signs of opposition to the one true anointed candidate.
As it was, is now and ever shall be. World without end of the Almighty DNC, Amen.
And anyone who complains about the DNC picking the candidate will be downvoted and ignored. We learn nothing from history.
The prince that was promised…
This man would be TOO good for any country. His visions are out of this world, he would have a lot of powerful enemies. Americans would probably kill him in the first month of an hypothetical presidency.
Bernie beating Trump is a nice fantasy, but it wouldn’t happen either.
This election was an information war, and the Democrats fought it like they’re in another century. And they’re going to lose again if they think sensible policy, however revolutionary and in-touch, and hopeful TV ads are how you win elections.
They need their own form of MAGA. And they need to flood and poison the internet and airwaves just like the Republicans did.
Sure bro.
Because the Democratic strategy of swinging right again worked out again.
We’ll capitulate hard and “meet them across the aisle.” That’ll surely work this time! Now, how far’s that aisle slid off to?
A Democratic MAGA equivalent would be quickly literally bulldozed by the militarized police nationwide.
Let them come
Bernie beating Trump is a nice fantasy, but it wouldn’t happen either.
You don’t know this. The DNC doesn’t know this (otherwise, why did Harris take such a beating?). There certainly is an argument for that, but it’s no way guaranteed. Sure, he might lose some finance bros in NY, but Bernie would definitely speak exactly to the people in the swing states. People who look at Trump to fix their economic problems without anything concrete.
They don’t care. It’s clearly not about the message, it’s the delivery, and Bernie would have used the same apparatus Harris used.
Bernie has much more populus appeal. Harris/Biden are status quo.
