• Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re wondering how a browser extension got so much money to pay all these YouTubers for sponsorship, well, they’re not. They are literally stealing the money they paid the YouTubers right back from them by replacing their affiliate code with their own.

    For people looking for replacements, Edge’s integratedauto coupon code works well enough. RetailMeNot does the same job and has also been around for a long time.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why am I entirely not surprised that LMG knew what the fuck was going on, and didnt say a fuckin thing about it.

    Made more public comments over legitimate criticism about his “just trust me, bro” warranty, than about honey being a out and out scam.

    • TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They might not be able to say anything. Advertising contract might have a clause saying they can’t speak of the details of their deal, or speak negatively about the sponsor.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Never watched the channel, but I would guess that being tech-themed makes it a worse look that they promoted it for so long before catching the issue, so they were worried it would cast doubt on all other endorsements and tank the value of advertising with them.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think coming out and pointing out what honey did would probably be the least damaging thing they’ve done in the past few years.

        because holy fuck have they had some whoppers.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The “hard R” thing still permanently etched into my brain lol.

          Context

          Linus misunderstood that the phrase “hard R” referred to the N-word. He thought it was the R-word. He was saying “people used to use hard R all the time, like on Family Guy and stuff. I used to use it too!” His co-host caught the misunderstanding and it was sorted out quickly before he said anything else embarrassing lol.

          • redisdead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            My favorite was the trust me bro shirt.

            You could see Luke having to physically restrain himself for calling his boss a fucking hard R word on live stream.

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait. How is honey a scam? It’s purpose is to give people discounts they didn’t know about otherwise, and as far as I can tell, that’s exactly what it’s doing. Maybe it’s in a gray moral area, but a scam?

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you actually watched the video you’re currently commenting on you’d have an answer to your question.

        But since you didn’t watch it I’ll give you a hint. It steals affiliate links taking money out of the pockets of those who are getting you a discount. It then uses those stolen affiliate links to take money out of your pocket as well by short changing you discounts (By telling you it found you a 10% coupon that is actually a 30% coupon and is pocketing the difference)

        • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Okay, that is still giving someone a discount they didn’t otherwise know was possible. That isn’t a scam.

      • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honey is getting paid by shops to only serve you the coupons that Shop wants you to see, potentially keeping you from discovering a better deal on your own.

        • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I have no idea how to find different discounts. If I’m getting a discount where I wouldn’t without the service, that isn’t a scam. Sure you can be more diligent and frugal if you know where to go, but I don’t, and I’m sure most people who use honey don’t either

          Edit: I would like to add, I mostly buy things on my phone, and as far as I know Honey isn’t on android, so I have never used it. I do, often, look for discounts on things I’m buying and almost never succeed. I really hope Honey comes to Android, so I can start saving money.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s not just Honey swapping the affiliate codes. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too. That’s why they require you to click on a coupon code to reveal it. When you click, they usually reveal the coupon code in a new tab, and helpfully redirect the current tab to the store, using their affiliate link.

    It’s more obvious when websites do it though, since they can’t auto-close the tab like Honey does. They also don’t automatically pop up at checkout like Honey does.

    I imagine some of the other coupon extensions do the exact same thing as Honey though.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    as a consumer why should I care if I still get a discount ?

    isn’t this influencer back office bullshit and not my problem ?

    • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The coupons honey applies may not always be the best deal around. Honey works with online shops to only serve you the coupons that specific online shop wants you to see, causing you to be ripped off on occasion.

      Simply put, there might be a 20% off coupon that can be applied to your cart, but because Honey is getting paid by the online shop, they are only going to show you at best the 5% off coupon. This makes Honey redundant, because neither Honey nor the online shop tell you when they are working together, which is why you can never trust honey to actually give you the best deal.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      it is your problem because they’re stealing your money too.

      famous person code gives you 30% off a product. honey tells you it’s 10% and keeps your 20% for its pockets.

      at least that’s how I understood it.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep and a great question that allows more people to learn. Please stop downvoting real questions

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          People are downvoting the tone, not the question. Calling it bullshit when it is seriously stealing money from other human beings and calling it “not my problem” under the assumption that it doesn’t matter if it affects others, displays absolute lack of empathy. Devaluing the question and making it a bad faith comment.

  • NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m glad this information is coming to light because I think that it should be fixed, at least as far as the affiliate link piece goes, but I find myself irritated by the sensationalism of the poster.

    They’re really pushing to make this seem as evil as possible, and milking it for every drop it’s worth. Making this a two-part series and not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me.

    Just post the full information you have, if this is really so bad, stop trying to farm clips.

    Also, not enough focus on the timeline. Honey’s business model has changed dramatically since it was released long ago, and I feel like the part two video is going to complain about the original Honey business model, which was literally just a coupon code aggregator, just based on the “cliffhanger” at the end

    • Imhotep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      it should be fixed

      It’s not a mistake, but an incredibly unethical business model. Why minimize the issue?

      not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me

      it doesn’t change anything to the facts though

      It’s serialization, as old as printed news. You can dislike that but it’s not like he’s the only one doing it

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If you look at their history, they seem to be a younger YouTube channel. I think he’s breaking it up more so that he can actually put out one video a month and not lose subscribers. He seems to be slowly managing to make the videos longer each month.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I suspected it was a smaller channel, but didn’t look myself. I haven’t heard of them up until this point so this story could be a particularly big opportunity for them, so it makes sense why they are choosing the delivery method that they are

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The dude spent a year figuring this out, researching and getting all his ducks in a row. What did you do, whats your contribution? Oh, let’s see, you bravely complained in a comments section about the way he chose to release the info, accusing him of the crime of sensationalism for clicks.

      Gee, why would he want to get paid for his work?? HOW SELFISH! It’s not like there are companies out there trying to steal content creator revenue, right??

      The way you complain more about him than the company, makes me wonder, do you work for Paypal, or that new project, Pie? Just weird to see you trying to make him look bad for wanting to get paid for his work. Sounds like a Honey thing to do.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        My guy take it down a notch, damn. I’m not calling for his head on a pike, I have legitimate and valid criticisms. I apologize if the tone came off more critical than I meant it but hot hell you came in spicy.

        But, to address your issue:

        Why does one wrong make a right? Why does him exposing the issue invalidate any criticisms or expectations of quality or integrity? To me it does not, hence why I criticize. And I even said I was glad the information is coming to light, and I’m grateful for him drawing attention to it, I just wish it could have been done a little more tactfully is all. I would like to have all the information right now, rather than waiting for a “part 2”.

        I also just don’t appreciate the stoking of anger, which has clearly worked. Ragebait is toxic and that’s what is being done with this story, from my perspective, so I don’t love it.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you dont know how a business makes money, chances are its some shady stuff

    Providing coupons on stuff for free, with zero ads? Thats pretty weird. Being Bought by PayPal for 4 BILLION dollars?!?!? There has to be some real sketchy shit.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      While I agree with you, I think we should be careful about allowing the ignorant to be punished. It’s unreasonable for a non-tech-savvy person to be aware of all the ways a company can screw you. If they’re skeptical of everything, they can’t use anything

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    I knew Honey was sketchy, but I just assumed it made it’s money from just data harvesting everything

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I always felt something was off with honey. I never downloaded it for that reason, it was just kinda too good to be real or something. Like how are they making enough money to pay all these YouTubers to promote them? Something wasn’t adding up

      • smayonak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you have multiple extensions installed honey always secretly steals the revenue from competitors without asking for consent. Most other extensions will ask if you want to activate cashback. Honey just disables their competitors and steals that affiliate revenue. It should be classified as malware

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        how are they making enough money to pay all these YouTubers to promote them? Something wasn’t adding up

        1. Know average amount of revenue a customer gives you over some period of time
        2. Figure out what percentage of that you’re willing to lose
        3. Get a loan
        4. Use that loan to pay to advertise to get customers you wouldn’t have anyways
        5. After the period of time (mentioned in step one) passes you’ll have a profit if everything went correctly

        It’s not really a mystery.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The thing is I think it’s feasible to do this in a non gross way…it’s essentially a search engine that just looks for promo codes, matches them against brands, and then tries them in rapid succession on the checkout screen. I think they would probably need humans to resolve the many 1-off issues (could work in a crowdsource manner like adblock filters) and a central registry to keep track of which ones fail, but it’s not a hugely complex problem.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the entire time I used Honey, I never once got a valid coupon code for literally anything. Pretty sure they scraped a ton of my browsing data though.

    • RebekkaAnsal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are you aware that there are other chrome extensions that offer more coupons for a ton of online stores? Dontpayfull Automatic Coupons or Retailmenot always have plenty of coupons available. I don’t understand why everyone is stuck on Honey, which has been of very low quality in recent years.

      • ansiz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I need to check this out, sounds pretty interesting to me. I never tried Honey because it seemed way too shady!

    • viralJ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same here. Newer found a single coupon for me. I uninstalled it a few months ago, not because I thought it was sketchy, but because I figured it must be better at finding discounts for things that I don’t shop for online, like shoes and pizzas or something.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        My wife uses it and I’ve never seen it find a discount code. I assume it’s because we don’t buy enough online since money’s been pretty tight

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t shop for online, like shoes and pizzas

        How do you shop for pizza not-online? Bro still going with pizzas brochures? Respect bro. If you top that off ny ordering by landline, it’d be perfect.

        But yeah I had similar thoughts on Honey, never installed and now I think I definitely won’t. Thx 4 i Lemmy

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why would you need to order pizza online? Not everyone wants to pay fees for the “convenience” of paying more for the food and having to type in my credit card info myself. You call them up, you get a better price, and you pay when you get there.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why would you need to ordering pizza, period?

            Food ordering apps aren’t convenient as fuck and I dare you to argued against that.

            If you live in a bigger city and have trusty restaurant’s with trusty service, yeah, call em. I do for two of my trusty places, but theyre rather far and expensive from where I now live. And the places around here change like everyone year or two. So yeah.

            Most people use apps.

            • Noxy@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Food ordering apps aren’t convenient as fuck

              I agree. Nothing convenient about overpaying to entrust your food to underpaid, unvetted delivery workers

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                God I hate this new phone the screen is just the tiniest bit too small and I keep hitting the left most suggestion instead of the middle one, turning ares into aren’ts and woulds into wouldn’ts.

                I’m sure you know what I meant.

                Pretending they aren’t massively popular exactly because they make the whole thing easier and more comfortable (browsing menus you know are up to date, being able to specify allergies as much as you want, etc) would be incredibly naive.

                Is capitalism using it aa a possibility to exploit even more? Yes. Does that suck balls? Yes. But does is the tech itself shit? No.

                Capitalism enshittifies everything. Automation isn’t cursed at because the current economic system mean that the working classes will get less, and that is a bad thing. The technology isn’t. So the tech isn’t the issue. Capitalism is.

                • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I use them only when it’s free (ie someone else is paying for it). I hate them so much. They are not more convenient, they increase the price by 100% and they actively hurt people and small businesses.

                • Noxy@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  browsing menus you know are up to date

                  A quick web search shows plenty of anecdotes to the contrary.

                  being able to specify allergies as much as you want

                  And you trust that?? If I had a serious food allergy I would absolutely NOT trust that a food delivery service would communicate those effectively given how much they push restaurants around, up to and including adding restaurants without their knowledge or consent.

                  I suppose in the strictest sense, sure, these apps are convenient, but you sure are paying a lot for it, and some restaurants charge extra for it on top of the fees, and the delivery folks aren’t getting a fair cut of the fees. Most of the fees go to big tech.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder what websites think of this toolbar stealing affiliate links from people doing all the work of promoting their prices. I wonder if Honey goes even further and turns vanilla purchases into affiliate purchases, actively stealing actual money from the site. If I were NewEgg or whoever else Honey has created affiliate links with, I think I’d be banning their affiliate account right now, or throwing in some captchas so their link theft doesn’t work any more.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If Honey finds a 30% code, supplants its own 20% code and tells you it’s a 10% code, both Honey and the store save money.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This only works if the store is in cahoots with Honey and only if they have coupons floating around that people otherwise avail of and only if they want to seriously piss off the people driving actual traffic to their store by letting Honey steal their commission.

        The reality is Honey is scamming everyone. Customers by hiding codes, affiliates by stealing their commission and stores by parasitically skimming affiliate payments for no work. It may be Honey has a shakedown “pay us to make coupons go away” but the reality is stores could simply not issue heavy discount coupons if they’re worried about that being an issue. Honey is required by nobody and given their parasitic & thieving nature I think they’re going to be on the end of some lawsuits.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Rent-seeking middlemen. This is the pinnacle of capitalism. Taking revenue while providing nothing is maximum efficiency. You can tell because it raises prices invisibly for everyone.

    This is just a baby version of how credit card companies have placed a 1%-5% sales tax on the global economy. You might say “at least the CC companies provide a service”, but that tax get’s added no matter if your using a CC or not.

      • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because enough people use credit cards that businesses have felt compelled to raise prices across the board to compensate.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        3 days ago

        When you get a credit card machine you sign an agreement saying something like transactions under X amount we, the credit card network company, will charge you 50c or any transactions over X amount we will charge your 1.5%.

        Now as a business owner you raise prices 1.5% to cover this fee. If someone pays in cash, the extra 1.5% goes to you, if the customer pays with a card, the 1.5% goes to the card network .

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Credit card fees get baked into the general price and are averaged between all the accepted cards. Hence cash transactions and lower-fee cards (debit, credit with less benefits) end up paying more of the share of the higher-fee cards.

        It’s well explained in the following video: https://youtu.be/OceYCEexDqQ

      • Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        In Italy it’s illegal to raise the price if you are using a credit card. The price needs to be the same no matter the payment method

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The same price must be charged for products purchased with credit card or cash. Otherwise the card provider will withdraw their service from the retailer. So the credit card margin is added to every price.

        • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          card provider will withdraw

          Dubious, as I regularly see gas stations with separate cash vs card prices. I’ve seen small businesses offer discounts for cash, too. And it’s not like visa is going to stop processing cards because walmart started offering cash prices. It’s just scare tactics. And for big companies, people who pay in cash offer bigger profit margins, so it’s not like they are incentivized to help the situation.

          • keckbug@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Actually true, but outdated. There was a massive decade long $30b legal fight that eliminated credit card network’s “anti-steering” provisions. Those were contractual terms that retailers signed that prohibited them from offering different prices for cash and card. Some retailers have responded by offering different prices, or otherwise adding a processing fee to card transactions as a result of that settlement.

              • keckbug@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Obviously it varies from business to business. Some may not want the hassle, some may see consumer sentiment against fees and not feel it’s worth the impact. Some are content to merely leave prices 3% (or more) higher.

                Ultimately, very few businesses price things based on their costs…instead they price based on what they think people are willing to pay, or what the market will bear.

                It’s also worth considering, at the scales of many of these businesses, accepting and handling cash is very much not a free option. If I’m a supermarket chain, I pay a card company a few percent and maintain my payment terminals and I magically get my income deposited daily directly in my preferred bank account. I’ve got some risk with stolen cards and chargebacks, but the big Chip Card and Mobile Wallet rollouts have dramatically limited my exposure to that liability.
                With cash I have a substantial cost to handle, collect, count, and deposit at each location. I have concerns about counting accuracy, interval and external theft, counterfeit currency, purchasing change from my local bank (which typically has a fee assessed for businesses), etc.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Cause they can’t charge more for CC purchases so they raise the prices for everyone.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You mean a free extension that claims to give me discounts seemingly out of the goodness of their hearts that also has access to every website I go to in the browser where it is installed is not exactly on the level? I’m shocked…well…not that shocked.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t believe that something too good to be true was too good to be true!

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I tried it in a Firefox container once, while shopping for Xmas gifts. Not only did it want access to absolutely everything, none of the things I was looking to buy got any meaningful discount from it. Surely that would make one question how and why this thing is even still running, unless you don’t ask many questions.

      • julysfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        People add extensions and then forget about them immediately, those are the true whales for these companies

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah the one that somehow has the money to get the biggest influencers to advertise them.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s kind of ridiculous how long it has taken for people to realise that this is happening… where did people think that their referrals had gone after they cratered?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      People realised years ago but didn’t really care much. End users generally don’t care since it doesn’t directly impact them, and “influencers” will often take a sponsorship deal without thoroughly researching the product or service being advertised, and probably just figured that people were buying less stuff due to the economy or whatever.

      The tech-savvy people that realised what’s happening tend to either avoid afilliate links, or use a cash back service (TopCashback, Rakuten, etc) that requires you to use their affiliate link.

      It’s not just Honey doing this. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thats where I’m at, I thought it was fairly obvious it was doing this and theres a hundred extensions like this. Are real people surprised this is how it works?